Which fighter proved themselves against the most diverse range of GREAT fighters?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by sweet_scientist, Jul 5, 2010.

  1. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    37,077
    Likes Received:
    3,733
    Duran was 29 years old in his prime when Leonard fought him. Hagler had not lost in 11 years.
     
  2. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    4,411
    Likes Received:
    3,897
    Granted. It's mainly my thoughts of the actual 'greatness' of Mathis, Young and Ellis that have me questioning the assumption around Ali. Duran did 'swarm' at times against Leonard, but when someone says swarmer to me, my mind tends to turn to the likes of Harada, Greb and Armstrong rather than Duran, who I might classify as a boxer-puncher on first thought. Fair points you make though.

    Yeah....same as above really.
     
  3. Bokaj

    Bokaj Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2008
    Messages:
    28,169
    Likes Received:
    13,164
    I'm not saying they were bad in any sense, but Duran wasn't quite as fast at WW as he was at LW and Hagler had clearly lost speed due to age. I certainly didn't mean to take anything away from Leonard's victories. I was just saying that Hagler had lost a step since chasing down Hearns and Duran since beating Buchanan. Duran had advanced in other areas since then I'd say, though.
     
  4. Tin_Ribs

    Tin_Ribs Me Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    4,411
    Likes Received:
    3,897
    But Duran had evolved into a more complete, patient and well-rounded fighter as compared to his earliest days at lightweight, whereas the Hagler of the Leonard fight had clearly lost more than a step to my eye.
     
  5. punchy

    punchy Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2005
    Messages:
    1,801
    Likes Received:
    10
    Ali no one has ever beaten the range of fighter he did he defeated Liston Frazier Foreman and Norton all ATGs, Liston was a boxer puncher with a great jab skills and power, Frazier was one of the greatest swarmers, Foreman was arguably the strongest most powerful puncher in history and Norton was one of the best clever spoiling type fighters, no one ever defeated such a diverse range of ATG fighters.
     
  6. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2007
    Messages:
    113,126
    Likes Received:
    48,362
    Joe Gans.

    Gans beat a world class box-puncher in Erne perhaps slightly past prime, but he also has Elbows McFadden so that is covered.

    He only drew with Joe Walcott, about as world-class as punchers get, but he did certainly get the better of it and deserved the nod.

    For boxers, he beat Jack Blackburn, about as good as they get.

    For a swarmer he has Battling Nelson.



    This would be definitive if not for the draw against Walcott. So I guess it depends upon how you feel about that one...from memory, the referee awarded Gans more rounds but evened it up on account of Walcott was more aggressive. I guess it's in keeping with the rules of the day, to be fair.
     
  7. IntentionalButt

    IntentionalButt Guy wants to name his çock 'macho' that's ok by me

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2006
    Messages:
    402,279
    Likes Received:
    84,123
    Fitting that he's the first mention, since he was the first to pop in my head after internalizing the phrase "diversity of styles conquered in quality wins". :good
     
  8. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2007
    Messages:
    28,075
    Likes Received:
    54
    Chang did okay in beating Chitalada, Zapata, Torres and Tokashiki, not akk were great but all world class at the least. People say his win over Zapata was tainted because of Zapata's apparent condition, but it looks a good performance to me!
     
  9. teeto

    teeto Obsessed with Boxing banned

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2007
    Messages:
    28,075
    Likes Received:
    54
    Fighting Harada beat great and world class fighters (either technically or simply effectively) of varying styles in-

    Eder Jofre (you try and define him, because i can't), at times he seems to be an offensive boxing technician, and sometimes he just seems to be a fighter, a very skilled one with surgeon-like precision

    Alan Rudkin- a pure boxing technician

    Hiroyuki Ebihara- on film, seems to be one of the best technicians the lower weights ever saw

    Pone Kingpetch- doesn't seem to have the biggest toolbox to me, but a great jab nonetheless, was a champion in a fine era himself.

    Jose Medel- would do some boxing in mid-ring but was always looking to unload and fight it out applying pressure (from what i've seen), Harada seemed to be able to put him on the backfoot though.
     
  10. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    13,744
    Likes Received:
    88
    How would you break down their styles? Would you agree with the following classifications?

    Welsh - pure boxer
    Kilbane - pure boxer
    Britton - pure boxer
    Dundee - pure boxer
    Tendler - boxer puncher
    Ritchie - boxer puncher
    White - boxer puncher
    Bartfield - boxer puncher?
    Ted Kid Lewis - swarmer
    Kansas - swarmer?

    Did Leonard ever beat a great or near great puncher? Not one I can think of....


    Do you think I've categorised the following guys correctly?

    Gans - boxer puncher
    Blackburn - boxer puncher
    Holly - boxer puncher
    McFadden - boxer puncher
    Jeanette - boxer puncher
    Clark - boxer puncher
    Walcott - puncher
    Jackson - puncher
    Ketchel - puncher
    McVea - puncher
    Wills - puncher
    O'Brien - pure boxer or boxer puncher?

    In light of which, did Sam ever beat a great or near great swarmer? Would you classify O'Brien as a pure boxer?


    Haven't got time to do it now, but if you can or anyone else would like to, would you like to break down into which categories these guys belong? Cheers:good
     
  11. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    13,744
    Likes Received:
    88
    Good call, even though Dempsey and Carpentier were a little past their best and perhaps Loughran a little prior to his peak. :good
     
  12. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    13,744
    Likes Received:
    88
    This could work if you could classify Duran as a swarmer. Not sure I would, but he definitely fought his first fight with Leonard quite swarmer-sih.
     
  13. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    13,744
    Likes Received:
    88
    Break it down :good
     
  14. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    13,744
    Likes Received:
    88
    I'd give Young a pass as an excellent (thought not great) pure boxer that Ali beat, but really, that was a robbery so I'm not sure Ali should get a pass on that one.
     
  15. sweet_scientist

    sweet_scientist Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    13,744
    Likes Received:
    88
    Wouldn't you say that Jack Blackburn was more a boxer puncher than a pure boxer?

    Even if that's the case though, I guess Gans would still have Young Griffo to fall back on, although even there some qualify it and say Girffo was past prime. I think Gans did arguably win their first contests though, and I guess that was a near enough to prime Griffo to accept.