Which fighters benifited the most by Boxing Judges.

Which fighters benifited the most by Boxing Judges & who were hurt the most by bad decisions.

 

Oscar De La Hoya has been on both sides of the fence more than once.

 

Dare I say it? Sven Ottke.

 

Sven never got a bad decision, its all a xenophobic German hating conspiracy against him

 

What I hate most is when a fighter gets shafted twice in a fight he won clearly, once could be an accident, twice is blatant home town cooking

Bobby Vanzie - got shafted twice against Graham Earl

Hugo Garay - got shafted twice against Erdei

 

Ali and Delahoya, if were talking about gifts of any kind from the judges.

 

1990's George Foreman. Those horrendous Alex Stewart, Axel Shulz stinkers! Plaaaa! ukkeukke . Crawford Grimsley, Lou Saverese were pathetic fights too!

 

I reckon British Journeyman Peter Buckley has a strong case for most robberies. Of the 246 decision defeats on his record, you figure at least 80 were by a round, so surely he deserved at least 20 of them decisions and perhaps another 20 draws?

 

I suppose you could make a case for Emile Griffith. One of our best posters on classic feels he lost all of the Luis Manuel Rodriguez bouts.

 

Marquez isn't really a classic forum fighter yet but even though I had him losing to Norwood and Pacquiao twice and drawing with John, all 4 of those fights could easily have gone his way. He has never been on the favourable end of a close decision and he would have had an absolutely stellar record and probably not been in a position to move up 2 divisions against Floyd too if those decisions had gone his way.

to top it off his first loss was a DQ who knows what happened in that fight