Which possible future opponent can beat JMM the great?

Who has what it takes...or even just a puncher's chance? :think

 

I dont think alot of fighters can beat him @ 135, but at the same time not really sure if Casamayor was a fair test. Id give the best chance to:

Nate Cambell-This would be a great fight I think both would go down
Joan Guzman-Whoever is faster at 135 takes this fight

 

joan guzman would have a good chance imo. i think marquez beats campbell.

 

Same thing I was gonna say.

 

You serious?

 

JMM is unbeatable, no one even comes close!!!atsch

 

guzman or PAC.

 

Pac Man, Cambell, Guzman... But I'd favor JMM to win against all 3.

 

Same here. Juan Manuel Marquez is an extroadinary fighter, but looking at his record, it doesn't read to well. A loss to Norwood, John, and Pacquiao. I thought he beat John and Pacquiao, but haven't seen the Norwood fight.

I think Campbell is overrated because of his win over Diaz. The man still lost twice by knockout to Peden, the same guy JMM ran all over.

If anyone at 135 if beating JMM, I still think it would be Guzman. Diaz is very open for counters, and doesn't have the power to stop JMM. Guzman on the other hand, is arguably faster than JMM, and isn't hurt very easily.

I favour JMM, though.

 

Guzman can't even make 135. Then he would curl his tail tail up between his legs and hide in his hotel room instead of fighting.
Campbell smashes JMM. If JMM signs the bout agreement.

 

You're letting you love for the Galaxy warrior blind your judgement. It's a shame when this happens, because you may have been fairly credible otherwise.

Nate Campbell got "smashed" by Peden, not once - but twice. Did you see what Marquez did to Peden? I think everything Nate does, JMM does better. He's faster, a better combination puncher, and posseses one of the best right hands in Boxing today. The Galaxy warrior got a great win over Diaz, but Marquez is a little to much for the old man.

 

Am I serious?

I am merely asking a question, not implying anything by it.

 

dude, will you ever let go of the Peden fights? It's ancient history. The first fight Nate dropped his hands, and the second fight was a bs stoppage on cuts off tv in australia. Give me a break already. Not to mention they both were at a time that Nate was killing himself to make 130.

Nate would smash Marquez, which is exactly why you dont see the fight being made. What other reason is there? Does Marquez not want to carry 3 world titles around? hmmmmm......

 

What about a potential Valero-JMM clash in mid 2009?

Who would win that?

 

I was just about to say that.. This Guzman is a farce..I am really amazed by the boxing forum hereatsch