Well that's my point about the whole safety of a black person being safer in Poland. Even if they went into a ****hole part of the town they are less likely to be killed or ****d or even beaten up as that of a white person in the ****ty parts of Africa. And I've no white guilt, I think as a race the Caucasian race has a great history and story.
Being middle class wasn't the initial topic as usual you've butted in. Again I didn't say they had to go off the beaten track, again you are butting in. A white person in a run down area of any country in Africa would be more at risk than a black person in a run down area of Europe.
You said there were parts of Berlin where you're safer as a black person than as a white person, but there are very few black people in Berlin. Turks/Arabs are not black people.
You don't have to go to Africa for this. The suburbs of Paris and Marseille might pose the bigger threat....
f hes travelling a lot I would assume he was well off enough to travel...perhaps you think hes a penniless drifter. WRONG. easy meat. anyone in an area rundown enough is at risk. the only difference is whether they look more fragile eg if they are small, vulnerable, female etc. I wonder if you know much about the places you are talking about.
So you think it would be safer or as safe to live in a Shanty town in Cape Town as it is to live in a run down estate in London?