pac would demolish marquez. better they not fight so the marquez fans can foreer think that he is on par with pac.
A decisive decision would be nice, but not needed given the fact that PAC wasn't the one who tasted defeat twice...or should have been twice if the first fight was called the correct way. Not to mention it was JMM who wanted to wait four years for a rematch instead of immediately...diminishing his chances at beating an ever improving PAC.
i have no problem with pac not fighting shane....especially at 147....i mean i would want no part of that too if i was pac....and i wouldnt call it a duck....but if you believe that....then dont mention paul williams when you start making out a list of floyds alleged "ducks"
More people felt JMM won than the first but that still isn't the majority of the entire boxing public. Plus JMM got lucky a legit KD wasn't called in the rematch and he got away with finishing the fight with only 1 logged. Had it been scored correctly there would have been no issue on the fight being closer or contraversial.
Not true...PAC is blazing trails in his wake. He's moved on to bigger an better things. And a point to be made is the fact that JMM was the one who didn't want the immediate rematch knowing he kept his title on a technicality. Of course it was finally made after PAC continued to improve and his stock rise...JMM felt the need to get on the money train that PAC was steam rolling on 4 yrs after the fact.
Marquez then Mosley All Pac-man Fans got to youtube and search this " Manny Pacquiao v Nedal Hussein rd 4 "
Do you know how many boxers were calling out PAC? PLENTY! and they still are now. PAC can only fight one fighter at a time. Plus Joan never made it to a point where PAC would even consider fighting him over the TOP guys or the BIG named oppoents. Joan was looking for a pay day. JMM isn't on PAC's radar b/c he's beaten him twice only to be shafted and ducked after the initial fight which JMM was lucky enough to get a draw based purely on a technicality! Then he high talied it as far away as possible from PAC until 3 or 4 yrs later when PAC's stock was high and JMM wanted a pay day. PAC has been careful match...matched against the best of the best and put into fights that would either make or break his legacy and career. PAC has made the most out of his fights and he's not only won but dominated most! He's been the one at disadvantages for the most part yet he still shines. A sign of a great fighter. Your arguement is "BEAT" like cake mix bro.
SCENARIO: PAC-JMMIII @140lbs you are forced to bet, who you got???? thought so...nuff said... Pac gave JMM a big favor...boooyah...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hPVr3qvvsAg Maybe hes avoiding this guy.....HaHaHa.....I think this was weaker than Clottey going down on a jab....44 seconds in.
Re-hashing ancient history and neglecting the present indicates you are reaching. Nard lost his first fight as a pro if you didn't know, but that is hardly remember based on what he's done since.