Who is picking Pac by Knockout against Cotto?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by JuanMa, Aug 2, 2009.


  1. Detroit

    Detroit Get Money Full Member

    2,655
    0
    Nov 7, 2008
    ME

    Pac by T/KO in 6

    Pac's gonna smoke that ass:hat
     
  2. JuanMa

    JuanMa business as usual Full Member

    3,448
    0
    Jun 26, 2009
    Damn in 6 wow :good
     
  3. Scrub

    Scrub Member Full Member

    109
    0
    Jul 31, 2009
    better becareful cuz maybe he can get an overdose and hit the canvas
     
  4. H .

    H . Boxing Junkie banned

    12,826
    3
    Jan 20, 2007
    sounds about right :smoke
     
  5. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    35,019
    18,283
    Jul 29, 2004
    TKO 8 to 10.

    Miguel will go out on his shield and Manny will know he was in a fight.
     
  6. Dynamite Kid

    Dynamite Kid "I Must Break You" Full Member

    4,408
    2
    Jan 31, 2008
    Me. I pick the southpaw slayer by TKO:hey
     
  7. general

    general UNDISPUTED Full Member

    380
    0
    Oct 24, 2007
    Pacquiao TKO 9. If I'm wrong, you can laugh in front of your PC! Just be sure that you are not alone! lol
     
  8. DobyZhee

    DobyZhee Loyal Member

    46,154
    13,837
    Mar 5, 2006
    I'll go with no decision based on cuts. Which would be the same thing anyways.

    Pac may just go easy on him so Cotto won't do a Nate Campbell.
     
  9. tolindoy

    tolindoy UBESTRIDTE MESTER Full Member

    6,396
    0
    Jan 22, 2009
    I pick clear UD win for pac....


    But I wont be shock if he knocks Cotto out at later rounds...


    BUT I would definitely be shocked if he knocks cotto in early rounds, especially
    from rnd 1-3...
     
  10. Scrub

    Scrub Member Full Member

    109
    0
    Jul 31, 2009
    that is not going to happen
     
  11. artofwar

    artofwar Well-Known Member Full Member

    2,413
    0
    Dec 20, 2008
    pac will triumph once again and add to his greatness. cotto is to slow. 10th round ko
     
  12. scatterbrain

    scatterbrain Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,867
    0
    Dec 7, 2008
    I am imagining how this fight will pan out.

    as the bigger fighter, cotto will have to bring the fight to pac since it would be funny if the smaller fighter is stalking the bigger fighter.

    just imagine a bobcat stalking a grizzly. since, cotto will have to bring the fight to pac, this will play into pacs strengths. cotto is a straight up fighter with limited head movements but very good counterpunching capabilities.

    he has a great left hook to the body and should he land it flush, it can be very painful and stinging indeed, unfortunately, with soutpaw stance of pac and great lateral movement, I do not really see cotto having a great opportunity to connect flush on pac.

    cotto's forward movement will exacerbate the stinging right hooks and left straight that pac will throw. the first 5 rounds will be a pretty even fight and stamina issues will come into play by round 6-9, advantage pac.

    if cotto does not regain his second wind, by round 10 i will see a dominating UD by Pac or late TKO. unless pac lands on the jaw of cotto ala hatton, which i seriusly doubt, i don't see the possibility of cotto going down in this fight.

    he is simply too good a fighter although i am not too sure if he is miles better than hatton at this point.

    Cotto is one bad mofo and he has the tools to do it. he has to rough up pac like erik did in the first fight. but he needs the stamina to hang on with pac in the middle rounds. if he cannot improve on it, (just imagine how he suffered in the middle rounds against clottey), then cotto is ripe for another loss on his resume.
     
  13. TroubleLurks

    TroubleLurks **** spell check Full Member

    2,765
    0
    May 23, 2006
    Thanks for the link. I'm in, Pac by KO inside of 5.
     
  14. ABN3R

    ABN3R ¡Acho! A mi plín Full Member

    522
    0
    Jul 20, 2009
    I'm behind my Boricua----COTTO!! COTTO!! COTTO!!
     
  15. los507

    los507 Active Member Full Member

    604
    0
    May 29, 2009