4 rounds is the maximum you can give to Bradley. I was rooting for him but I was listening Khan as commentator so I think that the two factors compensate each other and I was pretty unbiased
If the topic is who really won the fight, then the only acceptable answer is Timothy Bradley. I also feel that the fans were winners as well.
Using the Marquez III fight to justify this robbery is just plain stupid. I would understand if last Saturday's fight was between Marquez and Pacquiao and Pac was the one that got robbed this time (like the first two Morales-Barrera fights). The word "karma" would've applied. But no, Marquez was totally irrelevant in this fight.
Your score doesn't count for a Pac fight! Just like my Score doesn't count for a Mayweather fight... I had Cotto winning 115-113! :hey
How original? Did you come up with that on your own... LOL @ ur avy! Celebrating a corrupt decision.. :rofl Pac whooped Bradleys arse... Pac brought his C game and still won 10 rounds! Timmy sucks..
I'm not a Pac fan, but I must admit he was robbed. I believe The Devil (Arum) had something to do with it. Pac contract is coming to an end and Arum's not sure if Pac is going to leave or stay. I believe Pac do want the fight with Mayweather, but he knows it will never happen under Arum. By giving Bradley the win, it gives Arum reassurence that he'll still have a star to control who will never fight Mayweather as well. Should Pac decide to stay with Arum, a rematch will be made between him and Bradley, and no matter the winner Arum still comes out on top because he own both fighters.
This content is protected ''BANG!!!!!!!!!!!'' This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected
this theory coming from floyd fans is really laughable. why would bradley or even arum not let bradley fight a cashcow like floyd mayweather with all the money that it would bring them when even until now, bradley has problem getting a good money fight?