who should pacquiao have fought or stfu

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Trixie, Sep 6, 2010.


  1. The Evil 1-2

    The Evil 1-2 Member Full Member

    161
    0
    Mar 23, 2010
    Get off his nuts son. Too much of Pac-flavored nuts is bad for your health...
     
  2. NALLEGE

    NALLEGE Loyal Member banned

    31,396
    3
    Aug 26, 2008
    :lol:
     
  3. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    It was a good win but by no means a great or fantastic win. Regardless of who chased who, Who was favored or who agreed to the weight.
     
  4. timmyjames

    timmyjames PTurd curb stomper Full Member

    12,816
    1
    Nov 14, 2009
    no, i am going to say the guys he should have fought instead of guys coming off losses, at the end of their careers, at catch-weights, etc.


    pac had a great career, but no one will ever convince me that his post 130 career has been anything other than cherry-picked and over managed
     
  5. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    I've said this before so many times, the only reason De la hoya was the favorite to beat Pacquiao is cause of 1 god damn thing, SIZE ADVANTAGE. I'm like the only one that didn't pick De la hoya to beat Pacquiao cause i have a brain in which i look at photos of Oscar in training camp and read reports that he got beat up by a smaller murderer Valero in sparring. Roach knew Oscar would be dehydrated in which he admit it on the Hatton vs Pacquiao 24/7.


    And lets talk about Pacquiao other fights. Back in 130 pounds, Pacquiao hasn't beat any fighters "CLEARLY" in their primes. Pacquiao tko Morales in the rematch when Morales was past his prime, weight drain coming off a loss. Pacquiao beat an over the hill Barrera who was also coming off a loss. Pacquiao beat Marquez in a rematch in which MOST thought Marquez won it. Pacquiao went up to lightweight to face the weakest champion in David freaking Diaz. And yea after that, he went all the way up to ww to face an over the hill dehydrated De la hoya who hasn't fought in ww in over 8 years. After that Pacquiao ko an overrated Hatton who's best win is winning in a hugfest over an over the hill Kostya.



    ^^^Yea and he fought Cotto at a bs catchweight but yet fought Clottey at 147 pounds limit? Hmmm strange. But now Pacquiao is going to fight damage good cheater Margarito in another bs catchweight for a paper belt.
     
  6. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    ^^And after Pacquiao beat Margarito, you going to read many here acting like idiots saying like Pacquiao is the greatest of all times. Better then Ali, Leonard, Robinson, Hearns, Hagley, Foreman, Holyfield and so on and so on. This is why it's hard to root for Pacquiao when you got many ******s saying dumb **** about Pacquiao greatness.
     
  7. Trixie

    Trixie Active Member Full Member

    1,356
    0
    Oct 11, 2009
    You didn't pick DLH due to photos you saw of him in training camp and how his sparring went. I assume Roach and co saw this happening before it did? When the fight was offered to him he should have said no, i know you're not gonna be able to move down without killing yourself and that edwin valero will **** you up and sap your confidence, thanks though? How exactly did Roach know Oscar would be dehydrated?

    If Pac signs to fight Mayweather and then Mayweather sits on his ass and smokes crack for 3 months for the fight, do we attack Pacquiao for cherry picking?

    I wish I had read this block before I started to respond. You're obviously not getting the point of my original post. Tell me, if Morales, Barrera and Marquez were all over the hill/coming off of a loss, etc... Who at the weight should he have fought instead?
     
  8. Devildoc

    Devildoc Capo Di Tutti Capi Full Member

    11,804
    2
    May 18, 2009
    Well, consider the fact that arum is the one who used to promote Mayweather. I guess you can say Floyd and Pacquiao are really not that far off from each other.
     
  9. Trixie

    Trixie Active Member Full Member

    1,356
    0
    Oct 11, 2009
    What the **** are you talking about? We're not talking about Pacquiao's credentials, his claim to be an ATG or the proclivities of his fanbase. Who is asking you to root for Pacquiao. I certainly don't particularly root for him; I bet a LOT of money on Cotto and prayed for him to win. All I'm saying is if you dismiss all of his WW wins you are an idiot.
     
  10. rulb

    rulb ◄banned► Full Member

    688
    0
    Sep 5, 2010
    i think marg is just a tune up fight for pac to comepete at MW. if pac wins against marg in a one sided fashion, martinez would be next i guess then mayweather then retire.
     
  11. rulb

    rulb ◄banned► Full Member

    688
    0
    Sep 5, 2010
    and who's alt are you?:lol:
     
  12. Devildoc

    Devildoc Capo Di Tutti Capi Full Member

    11,804
    2
    May 18, 2009
    Probably someone who gargles on Maynever's **** juice for too damn long. That's why he needs to make an alt to make it less obvious. :lol:
     
  13. Trixie

    Trixie Active Member Full Member

    1,356
    0
    Oct 11, 2009
    Go on then...

    Well which is it? I go back to my original argument: tell me who he should have fought instead or STFU
     
  14. rayhogan

    rayhogan Dont worry Pac, you wont Full Member

    22,780
    350
    Aug 26, 2006
    Back then Pacquiao should have fought Soto or Guzman who was in his prime and not f4cking stupid like he has when moving up. I didn't say Marquez was over the hill. I said Pacquiao at 130 hasn't beaten any fighters "CLEARLY" that isn't over the hill.
     
  15. rulb

    rulb ◄banned► Full Member

    688
    0
    Sep 5, 2010
    or if not an alt, just one of floyds payroll.:-(