Khan's at 140 with his WBA title. Haye at HW with his WBA title. Froch at 168 with his WBC title. I personally think Haye is a better fighter than Khan. But Haye has probably got 1 more defence and then is a distinct underdog going in against a Klitschko. 140 is a good division, lots of young, well matched guys, but even the best guy(s) in the division is a long way short of a great fighter. Froch is by far the weakest champion of this lot, an accident waiting to happen, but he already has 2 defences. Thoughts?
Khan of course. Warren probably has 10 Salita type fights lined up for him. Haye and Froch go after the best and will have to lose at some point.
Haye is the best of the 3 but can't beat any Klitschko. Froch has been slightly exposed by Dirrell as someone who can be outboxed and I think he loses to Kessler and, for the record although he has a completely different style, Abraham. Khan will have the most defences although I don't think that will be more than 5 or 6.
I voted Khan simply because we all know that Haye doesn't intend on being around for much more than 2 years.
Frank Warren will guide his charge expertly through fields of danger like an elusive gazelle bounding through a field of lions. Mick Hennessey will allow Carl Froch - armed with only a bayonet - to go into battle in an era when war is fought with guns. David Haye is probably the world's smartest dumbass.