Whos more athletic? Ali or Wlad

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Dai, Nov 16, 2012.

  1. dyna

    dyna Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2012
    Messages:
    8,710
    Likes Received:
    27
    Anyone who is a more extreme endomorph, meomorph or ectomorph.

    Some might say
    This content is protected
     
  2. dyna

    dyna Boxing Junkie banned

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2012
    Messages:
    8,710
    Likes Received:
    27
    Nikolai Valuev was athletic too... for his size atleast and especially for somebody who suffers from gigantism.
    He couldn't land clean on Haye too. (Though he had knee problems/other **** related with gigantism combined with age)

    But Haye is very slick and extremely athletic.
    Also Chisora could land clean on Haye... it's more an issue of how Haye fought Wlad than Wlad his lack of atheleticism.
     
  3. BadDog

    BadDog Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2012
    Messages:
    1,345
    Likes Received:
    3
    then Wlad is a lot stronger physically, but not as agile and doesn't have his stamina.
     
  4. TheRoadWarrior4

    TheRoadWarrior4 Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2010
    Messages:
    950
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ali is such a robot! He's got nothing on the speedy versatile Wladdy
     
  5. Irländsk

    Irländsk Boxing Addict banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2007
    Messages:
    4,969
    Likes Received:
    6
    Wlad is a far, far better athlete than Ali ever was.
    I mean, LHW journeyman Henry Cooper knocked Ali into unconsciousness because he wasn't athletic enough to avoid Cooper's badly telegraphed left hook.
    No wonder he was beating up on poor, ancient Archie Moore and no-hopers like Zora Folley.
    Ali's reputation as the greatest is built on lies and false propaganda.