Who's Your #1 Pound for Pound?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by hellblazer, Jun 17, 2008.


  1. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    THAT's your belief! It's fine with me.
    Now! ANSWER my question. WHAT If it's the other way around?!
     
  2. dits

    dits Active Member Full Member

    1,011
    0
    Oct 7, 2007
    Manny Pacquiao. An exciting fighter with a great resume.

    Some people still argue that JMM won his fights against the Pacman, well, other people argue that BHop won against Calzaghe. I say that argument is a wash.
     
  3. Benjiabc

    Benjiabc The Nottingham Hitman Full Member

    4,429
    15
    Oct 2, 2006
    then pac will be undoubtaly number one, he will be another champion at another weight, and too move to LWW and win, i would rate him top 30 ATG fair enough?
     
  4. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    fair enough!

    one's thing for sure. pac will be underdog when he fights hatton. but pac is a warrior! he'll still fight even if he is an underdog.

    looking forward to see pac vs hatton sometime 09'!:good
     
  5. Benjiabc

    Benjiabc The Nottingham Hitman Full Member

    4,429
    15
    Oct 2, 2006

    so do you fancy pac to upset hatton?
     
  6. Dirty Bastard

    Dirty Bastard Dirty As Hell Full Member

    1,587
    1
    Jan 19, 2008
  7. CJLightweight

    CJLightweight Lightweight Kingpin Full Member

    6,598
    2
    Feb 23, 2008
    tell me how can he possibly lose in such a weak division and fighting with fighters not even notable?

    And i disagree that eubank and hopkins win is better than mab and morales? or have you forgotten the manner in which mab and morales lose? And that was 2x both guys. So double the credit.

    eubank who already lose to twice to steve collins and is at the end of his career, and hopkins who is 43 yrs old, also at the end of his career

    whatever happen to 2 great wars against 2 greats in their primes(e.g morales-mab, vasquez-marquez) calzaghe hasn't been in one
     
  8. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    9,268
    0
    Oct 28, 2007
    I'd be stupid if I say that pac is HEAVILY favored to win over Hatton.
    What I'm simply saying is that Hatton is favored to win over pac but I
    believe Pac has the meams and can upset Hatton.

    In the meantime, lets talk about up coming fights, what's your prediction re hatton vs malig fight?!
     
  9. fidds

    fidds Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,672
    106
    Mar 15, 2006
    Im a big fan of guzman


    But no way in hell is he p4p 1 not that he couldn't be one day but not at the moment.

    :good
     
  10. Benjiabc

    Benjiabc The Nottingham Hitman Full Member

    4,429
    15
    Oct 2, 2006
    hatton UD i dont believe he will KO paulie, i believe paulie will not have enough power to keep hatton off him, but will win a few rounds as he has the better boxing skills, i believe hatton will win a reasonably close UD 115-113
     
  11. ripcity

    ripcity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,449
    51
    Dec 5, 2006
    I'm leaning toward Calzaghe both he and Pacquiao had chances to set them selves a part from the rest of the field with impresive wins in their last fights. Neather did in my opinion. I'm waiting for Cotto/Margrito to determand who is #1 P4P.
     
  12. Circa

    Circa Skate And Destroy Full Member

    2,228
    1
    Nov 22, 2006
  13. Addie

    Addie Myung Woo Yuh! Full Member

    42,502
    401
    Jun 14, 2006
    I can't rank a man P4P #1 if he lost twice to his toughest opposition (Juan Manuel Marquez). :bart
     
  14. Benjiabc

    Benjiabc The Nottingham Hitman Full Member

    4,429
    15
    Oct 2, 2006
    my point exactly
     
  15. dangerousity

    dangerousity Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    20,253
    2,301
    Jan 4, 2005
    Thats like saying I cant rank Joe Calzaghe #1 when he lost to a 43yr old senior. Stick to facts mate, it makes the argument just that bit more objective.