ok, firstly he was a lightweight who beat one of the atg welters. Secondly, in the rematch he was incredibly out of shape, and shouldn't have even got in the ring. Finally, this is ridiculous that we're even discussing this... Duran beat SRL, thats awesome!!!! How can it not be rated highly!!! HOW?!?!?
why don't you shoot yourself in the head? duran beat leonard clearly. leonard > mayweather castillo-mayweather could have realistically gone either way. it's not the same.
Because it was one punch that beat Lewis, Duran beat up SRL over 12 rounds. Duran beat up Leonard!!! See some sense man!!!
Same here... the 1st fight was vintage Duran, my eyes never came off him in that fight. The re-match was vintage Leonard, my eyes never came off him in this fight either. 2 masters at their brilliant best... lets not try take Duran`s best victory away by being silly now... one fight cannot erase another.
That actually crossed my mind too.... of course he wont go there now because you got there 1st. I ****in bet thats were this was leading
Wrong answer....Duran beat him up for 15 rounds. That was back when you had to fight the championship rounds, the the fights were 15....Oh the good old days. If fights had been the ***** distance of 12, Tommy Hearn's would be the one mentioned in talks of great boxers, not Sugar Ray Leonard.:good And that dope Hagler may have actually been able to beat Leonard.....but that is only a slim hope for Hagler. He would probably have just plodded behind Leonard for 9 more minutes, looking the fool.