Why do you'll keep trying minimize AJs win over wlad???

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Pablo_p, Jul 20, 2018.


  1. OpinionOfACasual

    OpinionOfACasual Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,111
    3,981
    May 3, 2017
    And yet Finkel said Wilder 'wasn't ready' for the Wlad that fought Fury.
     
  2. inner2deepz

    inner2deepz Well-Known Member banned Full Member

    2,276
    1,637
    Oct 8, 2016
    Explain to me when beating a 40 year old on a huge layoff became a stellar achievement that the boxing world should bend the knee to?! No ones minimizing anything, it’s just not that impressive /shrug I’m sorry that’s just facts
     
  3. Sephiroth Rising 7

    Sephiroth Rising 7 'No tears please!' banned Full Member

    9,483
    8,779
    Sep 27, 2016
    Where did you get the idea that I'm intimated by a poster? Least of all by one all who desperately clutches at straws and makes up phantom arguments such as pretending that I agree with the idea that boxing in America is dead.


    No one has implied Wlad was in poor physical shape He was and is always in great shape, however mentality he was shot and old man can be in great shape, yet they are still not the same as someone who are is in their youthful prime. And lets' not even go into ring rust from not being in the ring for 18 moths, nearly 2 years without fighting, one less year than Fury's hiatus who people say shouldn't be rushed into fighting anyone of note besides complete bums to ease himself back into the game. And Fury is 29 years old!

    This content is protected


    This old man looks great, doesn't he! Yet without question, his cells, dna and genes would have rapidly declined internally where he can't do the same things he did as to when he was 20-30.
     
  4. gdm

    gdm Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,930
    6,997
    Mar 20, 2011
    Both fury and aj are much better boxers than wilder, but I still think windmill can beat AJ by landing one of his wild windmills.
     
  5. OpinionOfACasual

    OpinionOfACasual Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,111
    3,981
    May 3, 2017
    You can't have it both ways......
    You're just guessing again about both fighters 'primes'.

    Klitschko was not in his prime during his first 24 fights, So why are you assuming Joshua is?


    A 24 fight Joshua demolishes a 24 fight Klitschko.
    A 18 fight Joshua beat an extremely experienced Klitschko.
    A 35 fight Joshua against Prime Vlad? A guessing game......

    But Joshua's weaknesses are being improved upon fight after fight....
    He's the greatest prospect in HW history.
     
  6. OpinionOfACasual

    OpinionOfACasual Boxing Addict banned Full Member

    5,111
    3,981
    May 3, 2017
    He's a HW.....of course he can KO AJ, or any heavyweight.

    The problem is, that's Wilder's only way to victory.
     
  7. Sephiroth Rising 7

    Sephiroth Rising 7 'No tears please!' banned Full Member

    9,483
    8,779
    Sep 27, 2016
    Different era's and different factors tie in. Sports science has evolved the sport where today fighters have access to revolutionary technology where they can now train, recover and improve significantly faster than athletes of the past, within a shorter time frame.

    So of course you can't simplify everything and say well ''Klitschko, Tyson, Ali weren't fighting the same level of opponents as AJ. That's nothing but tunnel vision fanboy nonsense.

    And no Joshua is not a prospect, he's a fully grown 29 year old man. That's like calling Tyson Fury a prospect which is beyond special thinking.

    You don't know anything about boxing, casual. You only know about AJ and his opponents, that's it.
     
  8. gdm

    gdm Boxing Junkie banned Full Member

    10,930
    6,997
    Mar 20, 2011
    Yeah agree
     
  9. HerolGee

    HerolGee Loyal Member banned Full Member

    41,974
    4,029
    Sep 22, 2010
    surely it doesnt tie in, because you'd need to allow both parties that advantage, not just hand the advantage to the modern lot.
     
  10. Pablo_p

    Pablo_p Member Full Member

    156
    3
    Apr 22, 2015
    Oh please he beat jennings easily wasnt no visible decline you act as if he was getting tagged or jennings was giving him fits

    Fury & aj wouldve always gave wlad trouble 2 of the most talented fighter's hes ever faced

    Both 6'6 & above with great jabs aj got the combos & fury has the foot movement

    Name 1 fighter wlad beat or lost to during his run that beats aj or fury???
     
  11. Pablo_p

    Pablo_p Member Full Member

    156
    3
    Apr 22, 2015
    So basically fury & aj are tony thompson, sam peter & the boxing banker guy level fighters???

    Wlad couldnt catch & knock out a injured cruiser weight but aj wouldve got destroyed

    Outside the lefthook that first hurt aj he was missing by miles maybe a few landed when they was going back & forth but aj took them well so your point isn't valid

    Wlad always had a great lefthook but aj is no pulev
     
  12. Pablo_p

    Pablo_p Member Full Member

    156
    3
    Apr 22, 2015
    Yep AJ is basically Calvin brock levels :dancer2:
     
  13. Braindamage

    Braindamage Baby Face Beast Full Member

    11,010
    10,038
    Oct 1, 2011
    If Vlad was at the top of his abilities when he fought AJ, why then has he retired? It just doesn't add up! One way to measure the significance of a win, is to see what the vanquished fighter does after he loses. Now if Vlad was to rematch Fury and win, then your argument is justified. Vlad however has not fought since, therefore AJ beat a once great fighter at the end of his career. On that note, it was a great heavyweight fight. AJ showed a warriors heart and a champions determination.
     
  14. Pablo_p

    Pablo_p Member Full Member

    156
    3
    Apr 22, 2015

    Because he was in great shape very determined, showed no slippage & gave aj really tough fight

    Unless you feel sam peter calvin brock & tony thompson are equal to aj your point is totally invalid

    And its not a huge layoff if you're training for a huge & important rematch but your opponent keeps ****ing up & the fight gets postponed multiple times thru out those 2 yrs do you think he should've took a tone up??

    If aj fights & beats wilder it will not be considered a better win
     
  15. GlaukosTheHammer

    GlaukosTheHammer Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,017
    2,209
    Nov 7, 2017
    I don't rate most of Wlad loss very highly for the winner. Kind of a weird catch 22 I never honestly put much thought into. I suppose it's easy to make excuses for Wlad's pre Emanuel years and just as easy to make an excuse for Wlad's post Manny years as well. Basically the guy did excellent when his trainer was in his corner. Guys who came before didn't deliver the best version of Klitschko to us. Sadly Banks didn't seem to deliver the best version of Wlad either.

    Could just be a convenient way to explain a decade of fat, undersized, over-the-hill mandatories, or maybe Wlad really needed Manny.

    So best case scenario Joshua got a version of Wlad that was always very very good but not the best he could be, worst case Joshua KO'd an over-the-hill champion who has absolutely nothing to brag about outside of being the only full sized and in shape HW for a decade.

    Dude didn't do great when HW boxing was half decent and didn't do great when it came back to half decent. He only did great during the shitest years in the division, but those years are also the Manny years so take your pick man. Either way Joshua got a poor version of Wlad.