Why does everyone say SRR was the best of all time

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Nawfal, Aug 26, 2007.


  1. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,637
    47,333
    Mar 21, 2007
    And ignorant of the fact that old-school fighters sparred.

    More.
     
  2. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    35,884
    10,956
    Jan 6, 2007
    Sweetpea, I hate to disagree. Igenerally agrre with your posts , but..

    Hearns' only chance would be a brawl where he landed like he did on Duran. I think he would lose the brawl, but he'd have a small chance.

    If it became a boxing match, SRR was faster, had better movement, ring genaralship and more skill than the hitman.

    I think either way, the sugarman stops the hitman.
     
  3. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    Can we agree that fighting as many times as SRR did offers no overall advantage over todays elite fighters with 30+,40+ fights?
     
  4. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,637
    47,333
    Mar 21, 2007
    No. It's possible it could have offered advantage to some elite fighter from today with 30, 40+fights.

    For the truly spastic these advanages could inculde:

    RESUME; FINANCIAL; ACHIEVMENT; EXPERIENCE.

    If you have any more questions, like: "Why is smiles nice", just ask.
     
  5. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    No overall advantage to ones ability to box?
     
  6. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    :lol:

    Nice. Some of these JC fans are just too ridiculous....
     
  7. cuchulain

    cuchulain Loyal Member Full Member

    35,884
    10,956
    Jan 6, 2007

    Would you rather fly with a pilot who had 45 hours experience or one who had 1200 hours?

    Would you rather have your surgery performed by a doctor who had done 27 previous similar surgeries or a doctor who had done 200?

    The more time you spend doing something, the better you get at it.
     
  8. Carlos Primera

    Carlos Primera Boxing Addict Full Member

    7,114
    4
    Jan 8, 2007
    imo it's the other way around. srr's would be better if he brawled with hearns. hearns outboxes ssr 6/10 times, hearns had to much of a reach and height advantage, not to mention a extremely well schooled fighter.
     
  9. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    Why spar if you've already had a fight? Hell, why even train for a fight if you've already trained or fought already.

    Perhaps Michael Jordan should have just shot ONE JUMPER as opposed to thousands and not watsed his time.
     
  10. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,637
    47,333
    Mar 21, 2007
    Because of the general spread of peaks within boxing experience this cannot be held as true. But we've already covered this. If you're trying to waste my time, you're doing just grand.
     
  11. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,637
    47,333
    Mar 21, 2007
    This is all reasonable - and NONE of it even has to be true for the original post to be ridiculous.

    Which it is.
     
  12. Marnoff

    Marnoff Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    25,227
    22
    Feb 14, 2006
    Great point.

    Fact is that when you're forced on a regular basis to find a way to win against top fighter after top fighter, you either break or turn great. Period.
     
  13. China_hand_Joe

    China_hand_Joe Boxing Junkie Full Member

    8,217
    12
    Sep 21, 2006
    200+ real fights would leave you damaged goods.
    The human body has limits.

    Or you aren't left as damaged goods, in which case most the fights were no different from sparring.

    All fighters peak at some point. Most after 30 or so fight. Robinson after however many.

    Robinson gained nothing from his hundreds of fights+training (including sparring) that the modern elite don't gain from 30 fights+training (including sparring).
     
  14. Lance_Uppercut

    Lance_Uppercut ESKIMO Full Member

    51,943
    2
    Jul 19, 2004
    How do you know what the limits are? Human bodies do not follow some set of rules you make. There are variables to take into consideration for everyone. Nutriution, health, how many wars, drug usage...

    I hope you realize how ridiculous this post is.


    ALL fighters? :patsch
     
  15. McGrain

    McGrain Diamond Dog Staff Member

    112,637
    47,333
    Mar 21, 2007
    You are now changing the original number. Substantially.

    Yes. And different fighters need different levels to find them. SOME fighters never find them, never coming up against fighters good enough to test them.

    These fighters we generally say have WASTED CAREERS. Get used to hearing these words.

    What you mean here is not clear. I'm not going to answer the question for "30. 40+ fights" "100 fights" or this new "200" fights. It's unlikely i'll get a response anyway.

    Good for you!

    Based on...

    **** all i'll guess. As usual.


    This is not an analysis but a statment. Pitifully, it is also the best you can do. I could tell you about the fights Robinson had before he even mounted the MW division, never mind WW titlist.

    The sad thing is you are not interested.