Why does no one ever talk about Juan Manuel Marquez is a one dimensional fighter?

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by tinman, Aug 6, 2019.


  1. Flo_Raiden

    Flo_Raiden Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    16,726
    25,555
    Oct 12, 2010
    That’s really what it all boils down to, honestly. And it’s sad. That’s like using Duran as a way to compare the careers of Leonard, Hearns, or Hagler to see whose better since they all fought him.
    Instead of appreciating what JMM has done with his whole career everyone HAS to bring up Pac, while still crying about him beating Pac 4 times even after he’s gotten a convincing win. People are just never happy.
     
    tinman likes this.
  2. Pimp C

    Pimp C Too Much Motion Full Member

    122,543
    34,349
    Jun 23, 2005
    I was at the diaz fight it was here in houston. One of the best sporting event atmospheres I've ever been to.
     
    tinman and Flo_Raiden like this.
  3. Str8ryte

    Str8ryte Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,943
    95
    Apr 27, 2012
    Idec, jmm was a ****in beast
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  4. FloatingGhost

    FloatingGhost Some guy Full Member

    2,051
    459
    May 16, 2012
    I don’t think Marquez was one dimensional. Not going to deeply into it but in regards to some fights mentioned by OP, gainer ran. Horribly. Awful fight. Marquez presses the action against John and won pretty clearly in my eyes. And the same with the Norwood fight. Marquez was the aggressor in those fights and was pretty much robbed in both of them. When up against pure boxers Marquez tends to become the aggressor and still wins...even if the official results don’t reflect it. I’m a huge Pacquiao fan and a huge Marquez fan. I will agree that Marquez has been used as a tool by Floyd fans and garners undeserved hate from Pacquiao fans. Marquez is a legend and his legacy stands on its own.
     
    ndthentherewasx and tinman like this.
  5. WhataRock

    WhataRock Loyal Member Full Member

    34,275
    17,036
    Jul 29, 2004
    Jimmy McLarnin basically did what Pac did 80 years before he done did it.
     
  6. ndthentherewasx

    ndthentherewasx let it marinate Full Member

    203
    113
    May 5, 2019
    Where does this exist? Boxing hipsters lol
     
    KO KIDD likes this.
  7. tinman

    tinman Loyal Member Full Member

    34,955
    27,593
    Feb 25, 2015
    I've thought and said this for years. If you take away the Pacquiao fights then Barrera looks like the much better fighter. He just does. Obviously, you can't take away the Pacquiao fights. And Marquez still ended up 1-2-1 against Pacquiao anyways, but a far better showing against Pac than Barrera had.

    So you can't take away the Pacquiao fights, they were huge fights in both men's careers. But at the same time you can't reduce Marquez's career to just the 4 Pacquiao fights. Believe it or not, both Barrera and Marquez actually had you know, actual careers and fights against people not named Manny Pacquiao. Seems like a foreign concept to so many casual fans and fans with agendas.

    So taking a balanced perspective I've always thought of Barrera as being a more well rounded fighter. He doesn't have the power and stamina of Marquez, but as far as technical abilities and versatility it's Barrera all day.
     
    Bofo24, RacingBeat and Flo_Raiden like this.
  8. recycling

    recycling Active Member Full Member

    588
    54
    Sep 18, 2012
    Just because Marquez's hardest fight were pure boxers doesn't mean hes one dimensional. Alot of the struggle fights he had were against really minimal output, quick footed, angle driven southpaws who relied on only finding openings only for a straight left. That style is perfectly emulated in Rigondeaux. Those awkward fighters honestly, would make alot of prime hof fighters confused , especially old school ones because not alot of orthodox fighters are raised as a kid to fight lefty's who actually use original southpaw angles and styles. Also marquez edged those fights(fights which not alot of people would take), and honestly from those fights, I saw that he really understood how to trap and counter elusive southpaws. Marquez was skilled boxing iq wise, even back then; while someone like mayweather I feel got alot smarter as he got older.

    This style just started to become popular recently, even pacquaio's traditional jab-straight left combo is still making boxers confused at its quickness, angle, power and speed; and Pacquiaio isnt even a pure boxer stylistically or even mentally. Mcgregor is punishing mma fighters with southpaw boxing angles, which contributed to his rise.


    I also believe Mayweather himself; the pretty boy floyd version; did struggle against tricky southpaws. By the time he met pacquaio and ortiz though, he really figured it out (although his reach and size helped him here to, but the understandings there).
     
  9. Up the gut

    Up the gut Active Member banned Full Member

    921
    821
    Dec 10, 2018
    @Beouche someone that appreciates quality B
     
    Beouche likes this.
  10. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,760
    43,855
    Mar 3, 2019
    Definitely not.

    In fact he's very far from it
     
    roughdiamond likes this.
  11. George Crowcroft

    George Crowcroft Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    26,760
    43,855
    Mar 3, 2019
    Better résumé as well
     
    roughdiamond likes this.
  12. this_and_that

    this_and_that Boxing Addict Full Member

    5,697
    351
    Oct 13, 2010
    1. Marquez (only because of KTFO6. If that didn't happen, he's #3)
    2. Morales
    3. Barrera

    All HoFs and great Mexican warriors nonetheless.
     
    George Crowcroft likes this.
  13. Dannymita

    Dannymita Boxing Addict Full Member

    6,845
    9,468
    Jan 21, 2019
    Can't recall anyone ever saying marquez is the perfect fighter

    It's well known that like every other boxer he has a style he struggles with... He doesn't like movers.. Marquez is far more suited to being on the back foot he's good on the front foot but against a pure boxer or slickster he will struggle.

    Doesn't every boxer have a style they don't shine against... A stylistic kryptonite

    It was obvious he didn't like movers ever since the Julian wheeler fight.... I always thought he beat Norwood and Chris John... He would never ever beat mayweather.. Whether he came in overweight or underweight.. Was just never going to happen... And the Bradley loss... Is at the end of marquez career in a weight division he has no business in... While in that weight he scored his best win he's still about 3 weights over his best weight and the fact he could hang with top welters is testament to how good he was

    Hardly one dimensional
     
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2019
  14. pistal47

    pistal47 Boxing Junkie Full Member

    7,779
    4,294
    Jul 14, 2007
    I wouldnt look at him/consider him one dimensional, but --100 -- can see how hed be perceived as so. I'm not smart enough to articulate this, but anyone/everyone who boxes/boxed has a natural and sometimes instinctual way of fighting due to their gifts, what comes natural, trainers, etc. etc. Hes one of the most instinctual counterpuncher s ive ever seen, maybe even the most, and that probably developed along with him from the start due to growing up in Mexico and always fighting come forward type fighters. Hes no initiator, cant press the action for **** like you said.
     
  15. Beouche

    Beouche Juan Manuel Marquez Full Member

    23,723
    4,042
    Oct 13, 2010
    Marquez beat every style. TS is still smarting Marquez faceplanted his idol seven years ago
     
    Ph33rknot and Up the gut like this.