Why doesn't Lennox have universal approval ?

What's laughable is how pathetic lummox Lewis looked after getting slaughtered by Oliver McCall

Oh and can you explain how lummox and sol had girlfriends if they were both single ????

You need to think before you type

 

Foxy 01 is a ducker

 

No it's ignorant sub-humans like you who create myths about us being thick wishing it was true but you know it's not. Thick people like pedophiles occur in every group unfortunately. Am I going to have to teach you everything ???

You don't seem to know much

It's like single means not in a relationship. It dosen't have to be a marriage or civil union if you have a partner you're not single. Please try to increase your intelligence if you're going to conversate with me.

 

Worst thread ever. You people know nothing of this sport. Go follow something more akin to your tendencies… like macrame or prostate stimulation.

 

Who are you talking too ?

 

What you know about ANYTHING, plus a Euro, wouldn't be enough to buy a bottle of water.

 

And this has what to do with boxing?

 

Sirs. I know other problem with Lennox "Luigi".
1.The 42 years old Holmes beat an unbeaten better Mercer easier than
the prime Lennox a fat faded Ray.
2. The prime Mccall destroyed Lewis in the second round.
The 45!!! years old Larry went the distance with the prime Oliver.

This proves Larry Holmes was much more talented than Lennox.
Ok Tyson destroyed and Holyfield beat Larry.But why?
Because the 38 and the 42 years old Larry Holmes had ***** enough
for fight the prime Tyson and the prime Evander.
When fought Lewis the prime Tyson or Holyfield ? Never.
And what did Lennox after the Vitali fight ? Nothing .He couldn't find his
*****.This is the difference between the brave Holmes and the coward
glass-chinned Lewis.

 

1. Ok Tyson 17-18 years old Tyson lost against the older Tillman
who won the heavyweight division in the OG.
Otherwise these were close fights plus Tyson 17 years old Tyson
could knock Tillman down.
I think Lewis was in the canadian team.Who was Lewis most
dangerous opponent in Canada ?
Plus Tyson is younger than Lewis.
2. Lewis was very weak on the Og. 1984 Biggs beat him.His only win
was a talentless fighter from ****stan. This fighter chased Lewis
plus the refferee counted on Lewis.
3.Tyson didn' fight own original division (SHW) against Tillman because the super-heavyweight Biggs was better in 1984 (Biggs was an amateur star) .This Biggs beat Lewis.
4.Tyson's talent wasn't unknown.I think The Tyson and the
D'amato connecton was a well-known fact.Considering the
Tyson-Lewis sparring (The young Tyson was much more muscular than Lewis). Plus the young Tyson could beat decent
adult fighters in amateur.
Tyson wasn't talentless amateur fighter at all(He beat Milligan or H. Brock.)
5. You're ridicolous when you say Tyson hadn't skill for the amateur boxing.
The 17 years old Tyson was very good against the future olympic champion Tillman.
Lewis was weak against Biggs.
6.Tyson's punching power was well- known in amateur.
Read Isaman's opinion about Tyson !

Lewis' dream can't change he didn't fight the 80s Tyson/Tucker/
Holmes and Spinks.
Lewis' dream can't change Lewis wasn't an important amateur fighter
to the 1988 OG. Lewis had lots loss in amateur.

I think Lewis hadn't ball for an eighties Tyson/Tucker/Holmes/Spinks
fight.

 

To much **** to even respond.

At the end of the day, it is what it is. Lewis won a silver metal in his first Olympic try and a Gold in the second. Tyson won **** all in the Olympics. Tyson has a awesome peak that lasted about 3-4 years, and Lewis had a 10 year run. Tyson was knocked down more times that Lewis and lost by KO more times than Lewis, including getting KO'd by Lewis himself.

Those are the facts.

And only an idiot would criticise someone who won a both a gold and silver metal. You must be quite the athlete not to appreciate this.

 

Ali got beat by green Leon Spinks and REALLY lost to Ken Norton twice.....

 

Yeah because we know Ali was as fit and healthy as Lewis for those losses...

 

You do realise that Ali lost to Norton before he beat Foreman? He was hardly finished at this point.
I agree on the Spinks loss though, he had faded badly by then.

 

I pretty much agree with that.
I'm very surprised that anyone rates Lewis above Holmes.