Why doesnt Wlad hold the "Ring" belt at Heavy?

What crediblity? Who cares. You are getting your timelines mixed up anyways. Toney lost all he could? He lost only 2 times, both to Peter.

Ring and Lineal have nothing to do with each other. I don't know how else to get you to understand that. Having one doesn't guarantee the other.

 

You're a tool...atsch

 

:finger5

The Ring Belt sucks as much as Alaska!

 

So ****in lame...

 

Ring magazine is just like pound for pound. Complete BS, means nothing. Wlad easily handles any heavyweight around right now, period.

 

Stupid funny!

:blurp

 

Which is why they have him #1.

 

yeah, what an American. To come to this country and believe what everyone tells you sure shows great patriotism and courage....good job :good

 

As if im fresh off the boatatsch

I can hate Bush without hating America as a whole unlike your ****ing closet terrorist ass.

 

What the ****? How can you claim that the Ring is "anti-Euro" because they don't just hand Wlad the title without accomplishing anything, when the same organization thart you're attcking actually made a mockery of its own rules when they anointed Vitali as THE HW champ despite the fact that the other belt holders (as pathetic as they were) had better resumes.

Wlad is in the same position Vitali was during his "title reign." I'd pick him to beat anyone in the division, but HE HAS TO ****ING FIGHT SOMEONE BEFORE HE RECEIVES ACCOLADES.

Jesus Christ man. The nerve of some the ****ing posters here is mind boggling. You see guys slagging off fighters with myriad accomplishments, and then they turn around and start crying about national bias and "racism" because the boxing establishment doesn't get down on its knees for their favorite guy.

 

So much to touch on but i wont bother.

Read the ****ing THREAD!

 

He doesn't hold the Ring belt at HW because of the rules.

Wlad hasn't fought a Ring's top contender yet.

 

I don't believe there should be a Ring champion without the title unification at least being partially resolved.

I didn't like it when Lennox didn't face Ruiz or Byrd, and I don't like it now.

Whoever it may be: Waldo, Sam, Chagaev, Ibragimov, Maskaev - that one name has to come out on top of all.

My guess is it will be either Sam, or Chagaev, or maybe Povetkin if he proves ready.

 

I guess PolishPummler wants Wlad
to be recognized for something he is yet to prove positive, la crème
de la crème des les poids lourds, the most precious jewel in the
crown, el verdadero campeon, and that is another step towards
backstage corruption - Klitschko can't be elected The Ring HWT Champ
while he is sitting in the living room, awaiting for a stupid IBF
tourney winner just cause he produced a good technical display
against a former WBO Champ who was mostly in poor shape to sustain
more than 6 rounds of one-sided box activity and was pulled off by
chief second Buddy McGirt or cause he took 2 rounds and some clumsy
left hook hammerin to get rid of the Rain Man Ray Austin... Please,
you can't elect him the best of the rest only cause he looks to be
the biggest, most athletic, technical sound hwt out there, he still
gat to take the risk and go for it against the other true Champs! Actually, based on Wlad's somber and senseful post-fight interview against Brewsta, he's the only Kltschko fan who is not judging the ratings so please don't tie your wagon to the would-be star, tie your wagon to da truth!

 

God.....

I think we came to a conclusion YESTERDAY guys.