Are you a ******? He's a world champion. Just because it doesn't suit your agenda doesn't change the fact that he is you bog-eyed simpleton.
nothing to reply to then a reply? interesting. you claimed degale was a name because he'd fought the then unknown groves, which is nonsense. your shopping centre jibe is irrelevant. galahad outsells and is better known than quigg. so you agree if mick received a similar offer from sky he'd do the same as he did with bn. cool. viewing figures and purse. 5 see galahad as their main draw right now, and will spend more on him than sky will the relatively unkown quigg. how would the fight do better on sky? is there a more relevant measure than viewership?
arena is already pluralized. until quigg headlines a show we can't compare, and the size of the crowd is relevant, not the capacity of the arena. i want to know how you measure the success of a tv event, if it ain't viewership and purse. come on, our sol.
given galahad does headline shows, no it isn't. he's better known and a bigger draw than quigg. without explaining how you measure the relative success of a tv event other than viewership, i see. 1 of us is spouting laughable bull****, and it ain't yours truly.
If Nathan Clev v Bellew is PPV worthy Quigg v Frampton is, if Frampton believes he can beat Quigg, and I'll keep asking this why arent they taking the fight or wanting the fight?
You explain to me how he is the legit WBA champ then. Frampton is a legit champ. Quigg has a Micky Mouse belt.