Why Is No One Talking About Crawford's 10-15lbs Weight Gain

Yeah, Bud was apparently bigger, stronger, thicker, heavier, sturdier, more inertia, his head, arms, legs, etc. than Spence. Without those, what did Errol had over Crawford, when the latter already had the advantage in skill, IQ, accuracy, boxing, power. The former had nothing.

When they exchanged jabs for example, Spence was the one moved. Bud was so stable, he couldn't be budged, and he didn't need to load up, and already hurt Spence so much with short punches. What advantage did Spence had back there, nothing.

 

When all said and done this noob said its PED. That was his agenda all along.

 

Nebraskan steaks.



THE steaks.

 

my buddy just said that. hes from omaha

 

I am not sure if you are joking or not but you can bet your life if his name was Terrence Pacquiao there would be a 100 threads talking about this.

Crawford at the end of his prime moves up to 147 and stops everyone. Puts on muscle mass at 35 and stops a guy who had never even been down...
Yet Pac moved up, stopped a legitimately nearly dead Delahoya who was getting iv on fight day (and Pac didn't even KO the skeleton ODH), then stops Hatton who was never a welter, and the Cotto who had been destroyed by Marg and at a Catchweight is "FOR SURE" juicing... Uet we aren't seeing the same treatment for Crawford.

Not saying Crawford is, or Pac was. Just funny how certain fans aren't being consistent.

 

So what, you walk around as a dummy. No problem. lol

 

Bud Craw must be into the juice!
Mexican beef vs Nebraskan beef. Let's make it happens.

 

Better have a good medical team on hand.

 

Spence was a zombie.

 

Spence was bigger.

 

Because the win was so conclusive, the skill displayed so one sided that it was clear who the better man was on the night and the weights of the fighters played very little part in the outcome.