Why p4p is complete bull****

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by ramalinga, Sep 24, 2009.

Page 3 of 3
  1. VX.Nefarious

    VX.Nefarious Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2009
    Messages:
    8,871
    Likes Received:
    2
    yeah Ivan Calderon #1 p4p:yep
     
    VX.Nefarious, Sep 24, 2009
    #31
  2. MURK20

    MURK20 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2008
    Messages:
    3,570
    Likes Received:
    1,396
    And smaller men are be ranked higher because the competiton is always stiffer under HW because of the average sizes for the human male.
     
    MURK20, Sep 24, 2009
    #32
  3. manbearpig

    manbearpig A Scottish Noob Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2009
    Messages:
    3,255
    Likes Received:
    134
    I'm not meaning to be a dick or anything, and not trying to cause an argument. I just really don't like how P4P lists seem to me worked out. Muhammad Ali was fast, had a great chin, and had great ring generalship. Regardless of size, he would give anyone a tough fight.
     
    manbearpig, Sep 24, 2009
    #33
  4. Silvermags

    Silvermags Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2007
    Messages:
    9,268
    Likes Received:
    0
    It's only bull**** to people seeing their favorite boxer not in the ranking they want.:rofl:rofl
     
    Silvermags, Sep 24, 2009
    #34
Page 3 of 3