while i disagree, i think the reason most blacks like floyd and hate pac instantly is because of race. correct me if i'm wrong but this is a group that's sensitive to racism but ironically it is them who have strong preferences/subjectivity on race alone. see the need to hate pac by this group without having the need to have a reasonable and strong basis except for what, they don't like roach and his fans. i'm not saying they all are but a good number are like that here on esb. floyd says something, they become instant yes men. fact: a lot of floyd fans here only use phrases or terms after floyd has used them. they find excuses when floyd contradicts himself, but you can see how they attack pac when pac contradicts himself. this is a very sensitive group that will involve pac's name at the instant someone criticizes floyd. that is their justification. floyd insults someone else, they laugh or ignore. but when floyd is not even insulted, but rightfully criticized they instantly flock to the defense of floyd. like i said, this is a very sensitive group when it comes to how others treat floyd or them. but the tolerance they have for floyd when floyd blatantly errs is unbelievably high.
Is there a poll that shows what % of race likes a certain fighter? All the Floyd fans I know arent black.
I don't like Pacquaio because he have super eyes I don't like Floyd because, because he is way to tanned.
Anybody who doesn't like a boxer because of his fans or trainer is a ******. How can you not like someone because of other people?atsch
Why is it necessary to hate Pac or hate Mayweather? Why must we choose who to hate? What if I don't want to hate either one of them and instead try to speak objectively about each?
pac is a fraud who is afraid of drug test. 1st he has a problem with the test, then he says hes okay with it, no problems at all, now he has a problem with it again. dude has been exposed so many times we cant even keep up with it
I have owned you many times throughout debates in many threads. YOU CAN'T WIN A DEBATE BY RESPONDING WITH "*****S ARE FUNNY" OR "FUK U *****" OR "LOL WOW, AN ENTIRE POST TO MY 2 LINES" ...WHILE YOUR ACTUAL POSTS SHOW THAT YOU JUST DONT BELIEVE THE POSTER...THAT IS NOT IMPORTANT.....There is still an argument at hand.. YOU LOSE AND GET OWNED BECAUSE OF THE IDIOT RESPONSES YOU MAKE IN REBUTTAL; HOW THE FUK U GONNA NOT GET OWNED WHEN U DONT EVEN FOCUS ON THE ARGUMENT AT HAND?:huhatsch *******S 1. IGNORE FACTS 2. DOWNGRADE VALID INFO 3. PAY 0 ATTENTION TO ANY ARGUMENT THAT IS NEGATIVE TO THEIR OWN. 4. DO NOT ADDRESS FACTS SHOWN TO THEM, IN REBUTTAL TO THEIR ORIGINAL RESPONSE 5. INSULT THE POSTER, RATHER THAN FOCUS ON THE ARGUMENT AT HAND; BY DOING THIS THEY LOSE THE ARGUMENT EASY AS THEY DONT EVEN ADDRESS THE ARGUMENT THEIR OPPOSITION IS PUTTING UP. 6. COME UP WITH OFF THE WALL $HIT WITH NOTHING TO BACK IT, JUST TO MAKE THEMSELVES LOOK LIKE THEY SAID SOMETHING VALID; MANY TIMES THIS OFF THE WALL $HIT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH BOXING. YOUR GUILTY OF NUMBER 1 NUMBER 2 NUMBER 3 AND ESPECIALLY NUMBER 4 NUMBER 5 NUMBER 6 WOW.....EVEN PUGI ONLY HAD 5 OF EM ON HIS LIST..YOUR THE 1ST ******* WITH 6. As long as your rebuttals include simple responses like "***** fuk you"..I'm going to own you..YOU DO NOT KNOW HOW TO DEBATE. YOUR POSTS DO NOT HAVE MUCH OF ANYTHING TO SAY ABOUT MY "ACTUAL ARGUMENT".. THIS GUYatsch Bro your not even smart enough to realize that your own posts are what own you... Gander Tasco put up a very good argument...was shot down by a video exposing Pac's footwork and sloppy combos....BUT IT WAS A VERY GOOD ARGUMENT.. SOMETHING YOUR NOT CAPABLE OF:deal NOW COME BACK WITH "WOW A WHOLE PAGE TO MY 3 LINES" SO I CAN KEEP OWNING YOU.. WHEN I TELL YOU IM OWNING YOU CODER..IM NOT DEBATING..IM TELLING U THATS WHAT IT IS..DEAL...N IF I DONT OWN U IN A DEBATE..THEN I WONT SAY THAT...BUT LETS FACE IT..YOUR GETTING OWNED CUZ OF YOUR STUPID A$$ REBUTTALS LIKE "*****". TRY AGAIN.
atsch **** off with this when most *****s are fans of Donaire. Actually I think all fomos like Donaire