Whyte v Chisora 2 over 400k buys?

Discussion in 'British Boxing Forum' started by Puroresu_Fan, Jan 2, 2019.



  1. PaddyGarcia

    PaddyGarcia #IrrationalGarcia Full Member

    10,045
    5,150
    Sportsbook:
    3,008
    Feb 13, 2014
    A wild Matchroom bot appeared
     
  2. bladesman

    bladesman Active Member Full Member

    689
    299
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    May 31, 2015
    I want ppv cards to be worth money.I'd say 90% of the time i come away happy with them.

    Some of the 'saturday night fight' level cards are really not great. Why? Because the money isn't there for them.
     
  3. PaddyGarcia

    PaddyGarcia #IrrationalGarcia Full Member

    10,045
    5,150
    Sportsbook:
    3,008
    Feb 13, 2014
    How can there be no money there for them all of a sudden when almost every decent fight is on PPV?
     
    Wizbit1013 likes this.
  4. T_S_A_R

    T_S_A_R Member Full Member

    287
    101
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Jan 9, 2011
    Because Matchroom have a contract with Sky and it's only for something like £200,000 per Saturday Fight Night.
     
  5. Puroresu_Fan

    Puroresu_Fan Boxing Addict Full Member

    4,630
    3,265
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Apr 6, 2016
    Which some people do not seem to understand. Purses go up, right fees go down.
     
  6. Thorpe28

    Thorpe28 New Member Full Member

    18
    10
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    Apr 23, 2018
    There is a limit to the number of PPVs they will put on in a year (Lets say 6)

    If the other Saturday night fight cards are a mix of domestic dust ups, world title eliminators and 1-2 world title fights then I don't see the issue, if there SFN cards become utterly appalling then we have an issue...

    I honestly don't mind getting the international shows and the Saturday night fight cards included in Skysports then paying for a few PPVs a year (Excuse to get a few mates round, beers, takeaway and make a night of it to be honest)

    It is only £20 and like people have said what else can you do on a Saturday night for £20!!
     
  7. Wizbit1013

    Wizbit1013 Member booted Full Member

    293
    280
    Sportsbook:
    1,065
    Mar 17, 2018
    I think most people understand that

    But if that's what boxing pays and the fighters don't like it then don't get in to it

    Harsh? Maybe a tad but it's a fact

    It won't happen though as we are experiencing a boom where people are being made to pay for any competitive fight

    It's all good right now but I dread to think what happens when the bubble bursts

    Thankfully it seems some way off
     
  8. PaddyGarcia

    PaddyGarcia #IrrationalGarcia Full Member

    10,045
    5,150
    Sportsbook:
    3,008
    Feb 13, 2014
    Feels like it's got worse in the last year, I don't see how that figure suddenly becomes a hurdle out of nowhere. And the answer to that is to make most actually good fights PPV, ultimately making the fans pay more? Doesn't seem right to me. Especially not with ITV and BT in the market as well now. They should be fighting for viewers, not adding a tariff individually.
     
    Twentyman, Scissors and Wizbit1013 like this.
  9. ryanm8655

    ryanm8655 Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,854
    563
    Sportsbook:
    500
    Oct 23, 2008
    Budget may well be £200k but can still add ticket sales to that, so enough to put on some decent fights.

    Not that I’m bemoaning Whyte Chisora being ppv. If it makes more money that way then it makes sense. Did pretty well. It may be an all British fight but it was a big one and the winner likely faces AJ.
     
  10. ButeTheBeast

    ButeTheBeast Well-Known Member Full Member

    1,567
    102
    Sportsbook:
    1,000
    May 27, 2012
    It's in Sky's interests to lower the rights for a typical Saturday fight night. They can then justify PPV.

    BT put on Frampton and Fury on the same card and that was not PPV.
     
  11. TonyHayers

    TonyHayers Active Member Full Member

    959
    594
    Sportsbook:
    721
    Nov 1, 2018
    In fairness that was Frampton and Fury (neither of which are particularly big sellers) in fights against very poor opposition. Comparable really to the Brook/Khan/Canelo fights which have been on standard Sky this year.
     
  12. TonyHayers

    TonyHayers Active Member Full Member

    959
    594
    Sportsbook:
    721
    Nov 1, 2018
    If it was purely a case of getting people to watch all fighters would be desperate to be on terrestrial free to air television and more expensive platforms like Sky and BT wouldn't exist.
     
  13. PaddyGarcia

    PaddyGarcia #IrrationalGarcia Full Member

    10,045
    5,150
    Sportsbook:
    3,008
    Feb 13, 2014
    Poorly worded on my part, I mean more that it doesn't feel like anyone is fighting to get the consumer on their side, rather that everyone is adding additional expense to the consumer all the time. It's getting more and more expensive to be a boxing fan and it isn't clear to me that the product we're paying for is any better. Which is where my frustration comes from.
     
  14. TonyHayers

    TonyHayers Active Member Full Member

    959
    594
    Sportsbook:
    721
    Nov 1, 2018
    I suppose I think the product is getting better. You still get bad cards of course, but as a boxing fan in the UK in the last five years or so we've had Klitschko, Golovkin and Usyk over here, all of whom were top level pound for pound elite fighters, boxing feels like a bigger sport in general (admittedly largely thanks to Joshua), and the man in the street seems more keen to watch and (crucially) invest money into the sport.

    I always end up comparing what Hearn is doing in what you could call the 2010's with what Warren did late 90's and throughout the 2000's and I think it's better now. More competitive fights and a willingness to invest. I've said it before but if Hearn treat his fighters the way Warren handled Calzaghe and Hatton for years and years there would be absolute uproar and rightly so. And as much as people hate paying PPV prices I don't think anyone looks back at Julius Francis, Michael Jennings, Audley Harrison, Dmitry Salita and Danny Williams headlining box office PPV fights and thinks 'that's when you only got quality PPV fights.'

    I remember those days, compare it to now, and I honestly think now is better.
     
  15. PaddyGarcia

    PaddyGarcia #IrrationalGarcia Full Member

    10,045
    5,150
    Sportsbook:
    3,008
    Feb 13, 2014
    It was ace having GGG over here but he was fighting someone 2 weight classes below, which seems to have effectively played a part in killing that guy's career, so I'm very split on that. AJ-Wlad, fine with that being PPV. Genuine top tier fight with meaning. That is really what the model ought to be for.

    My thinking is that the standard Sky cards have suffered in the last year or so and that PPV is more and more prevalent; it isn't just about Sky. I mean, you've even got Eubank Jr-Degale on PPV now for some reason. A horse waiting to be put down and a never ran. That's announced a couple of weeks after we had two PPV cards clashing head to head, two cards which had a grand total of two world title fights between them. PPV has felt ubiquitous this year and I don't see it changing with the consensus attitude toward the model.
     

Share This Page