Wilder vs Dillan Whyte

On the real though how the hell are you a mod?

Like this is a boxing site and we have biased posters who literally make troll posts running around with mod powers.

Mind bobblin

 

Hearn signed Ortiz in order to get him exposure and make the fight with AJ bigger. It was a similar situation to how he bought Povetkin over and featured him knowing that fight was going to be mandated soon.

They had ZERO issues making the povetkin fight, Povetkin is a MUCH BETTER fighter than Ortiz and that really can't be questioned unless you are a straight troll.

Ortiz then stunk the building out twice in a row against domestic journeyman level opposition so hearns like ffs, and the next thing you know he's fighting Wilder.

FACTS

 

Whyte is a tough boxer no doubt and he's taken some tough fights but he really needs to get a legitimate win against a good opponent for knowledgeable boxing fans to take him seriously as a top contender.
Obviously he should fight Chisora again next, but that won't happen.
There's no proof that Whyte can beat Parker is a legitimate fight yet either. That was one of the most crooked and dubious wins you'll ever see.

But Eddie Hearn and the whole media machine has done a great job building Whyte up and glossing over the facts.

I think Wilder would find Whyte ridiculously easy to hit and that would be a disaster for Whyte.

 

I respect you as a poster but you need you eyes testing,

AJ is not there.

 

how many titles has Ortiz won again?

At least Ortiz knows how to sign a contract, unlike someone...

ooooooooooopsie

 

I don't think you realise where you are attempting to go with this.

How many titles has Takam won? in fact when has Takam ever been or made an appearance in an independent top 10 rankings?

Ortiz was the better fight, a fight AJ and Hearn wanted no part of.

Also a fight I'd hazard a guess that you yourself probably had Ortiz beating Wilder prior to the fight.

 

Povetkin is better than Ortiz I've no problem what so ever agreeing to that.

However, in '16 Hearn brought over Ortiz and yes he stunk out against Scott but beat down Allen the same Allen that Whyte laboured on points to.

Also if Hearn dropped Ortiz on the pretence that he stunk the joint out against Scott why then at the same time was he still banging the drum about AN v Whyte 2?

When Whyte was in '16 beating the likes of Bacurin, Tann and getting a gift over Chisora?

Hearn never had any intention of making the fight. Too risky at that stage.

 

Wilder may be unproven against top talent but until he is beaten it is hard to bet against him.

 

I honestly don't know what to make of the on again, off again Wilder-AJ bout. I don't believe either man fears the other but I think what they both fear is giving up the Golden Goose, i.e. the big 0, and all the money that comes with it. Either guy can win this fight, but, for me anyway, AJ has to be the odds-on favorite. He has the pedigree, the fundamentals, the amateur background. That doesn't mean Wilder can't win. He can. It's just that AJ has a more proven track record. If they were smart, though, they would make this happen soon, very soon, so they can produce a trilogy and a lot of money for both of them.

 

In all honesty I called it a 50/50 fight before hand. Yes Ortiz looks the better win on paper - but my point still stands: Ortiz has done nothing and will do nothing.

 

Finally a Wilder supporter who is not completely illiterate.

At what point will it occur to you that Wilder doesn't take on challenges, just look at his managers and record.

"Fact" has lost its meaning recently but let me try to rebirth it:

Wilder has 1 good win and thats against a "38" year old with heart issues

Wilder has never fought in a unification

Wilder has never sold a PPV

Wilder has never sent a contract to AJ

Wilder has never sold out an arena

Forget Hearn, AJ is the top dog for a reason - he takes on challenges. Also, Wilder just recently came out saying he won't fight AJ at all - how can you defend that responsibly? you cannot.

What Yulaverse are you living in?

ps there is a spelling mistake in my post, you get a gold star if you can find it.

 

I have come to the conclusion that Wildier is avoiding four British HWs maybe even five or six