Will Pac ever fight a good opponent?

You just been branded as the newest NOOB in the ESB noobies corner congrats!:rofl He has one of the best resume's boxing, but then again you did not know that, you were a WWF fan before coming here?

 

Dont need to reply to this as I see others have allready corrected your dumbass. And comparing a Morrales of then to the Maidana fight is woefull

 

Correct.

 

Marquez x2 and Bradley x2.
Four times in the last 3 years.

I have a feeling he will fight Garcia next so that is good as well.
Chris, is ok. We'll see if the kid turns out to be greater than ok.

 

Agree

 

I don't think anybody can complain about the names Pac's fought on paper I think for a critic it's more about the majority of his best wins coming vs guys who were recently destroyed/embarrassed and at the lowest point in there careers. For me that's the only real mark I have against him it's really no fighter Pac has beat that you can say was looking good at the time he fought them just that they were good years before.

 

:-lol::rofl

 

Oh no, what a dreaded situation for me, Karl the ******* is laughing at me..

 

So was Cotto at his lowest? or coming off a loss? NO he lost 16 months before and had 2 wins inbetween Margo and Pac.

JMM every time they fought was not coming off of loses

Bradley was unbeaten

Rios was coming off his ONLY loss BUT so was Pacquiao a devastating KO loss at that

Mosley for both Fraud and Pac was not a prime mosley

No idea why they fought Clottey but he put up a better show in his previous fight with Cotto than he did with Pac

Hatton Had just TKO'd Paulie

No point talking about the stupid ODLH

Diaz was not at his lowest nor was he coming off a defeat

Barera was on a 9 win streak and after his frst defeat went on to retain titles

Morrales was defeated after 1 attempt at LW only 1 year after leaving SFW, so no real excuse for getting to fighting weight, unlike with ODLH

So there you go FACTS that disprove your twist on it.. But hey NOT everyone can avoid losing the ZERO like your idol Fraud WILLNEVER.

Whats worse is Pacquiao has 5 loses and Fraud is still shaking in his boots, ask his KIN they will tell you

 

Yeah he's crap isn't he. Never fought anyone worthy of note. Shocking.

I swear this place is a magnet for wankers.

 

.


in order that you listed them (Cotto had no trainer, arguably lost 2/3 fights going in one by KO, and recently lost his father)

(In 4 fights Pac has never legitimately beat JMM once, and should really have at least 3 losses to him)

(Pac Lost to Bradley and almost lost the rematch)

(coming off a robbery vs Abril and loss to Alavardo)

(coming off a loss and draw openly ducked after the Margarito win)

(Officially coming off a loss but arguably Pac's best WW win which says a lot)

(Got KO'd by Floyd and almost got stopped by Lazcano openly said he was at his lowest and was doing coke after losing to Floyd)

(Self explanatory Pac was bigger than Hoya that fight not his fault though)

(Unbeaten but the weakest title holder in the division)

(1st fight I feel is his best win much credit 2nd fight pointless coming off a loss)

(was 1-6 during that period including losing 5 straight after Pac-EM I then retired for a few years)

look man I respect that Pac has won Titles in 8 divisions that's hard to do regardless more than the guys he fought to get them. To go up that high things have to fall together right. But the only guys who looked good outside of the 1st Barerra fight he lost to. You bringing up Mayweather I don't care about his undefeated record I put more stock in his 4 Lineal titles and 5 division titles more than that. As far as why May-Pac didn't happen we can agree to disagree I think Mayweather bs'in out of spite right now but factually Pac turned the fight down twice, **** em both.

 

Barrera, Morales, Marquez, Cotto, Lebwada, Bradley, Hatton, De le Hoya, Saskul


the bums the bums the bums, he can't get enough of them bums

 

The only real bum Pac has fought is Rios, none of the guy were bums just at low points of there careers even roach says that's how they pick guys. It's hard to matchup 2 great fighters in there absolute prime. Even if Mayweather-Pacquiao happened in 10' neither would have been at there very best Floyd was 1 fight removed from a 2 year retirement and Manny was 3/4 division above his best weight both at the top of their game but at there respective best not at all.

 

You just keep on proving my point about the hypocrisy of the *****s! :deal

You say you don't know and don't care when ODLH was shot yet you care enough for when he fought Pac. He fought Floyd on 5/07 then a year later, 5/2008, he fought Forbes as a tune up for a rematch with Floyd! In 12/08 he fought Pac. Did ODLH became shot on the Forbes fight or as soon as round 12 ended with the Floyd fight? You failed, like all the *****s, to acknowledge that Pac had just fought at 135lbs before ODLH offered him the fight. Was Pac to jump from 135 to 154 for Oscar?

As for Cotto, how is that Pac's problem if Cotto is going through that. Cotto could have pulled out of the fight if he really saw that as a problem. It wouldn't have been the first time a boxer pulls out of a fight. As for the catchweight, what do you call then the catchweight that Floyd imposed on Canelo, granted Floyd had fought previously at 154? Is that a legit win? If you see Pac as a fraud and trying to take advantage then you have to see the same thing on Mayweather.

 

Picking on Pacquiao's resume is the dumbest forum pastime along with picking on Mayweather's resume. Both stupid hater sh*t. But I'm of the opinion Pacquiao picked a guy who will have a good chance to beat him stylistically.