will you blame Floyd for ducking Trout? I wouldn't!

Discussion in 'World Boxing Forum' started by Round1gymDC, Apr 15, 2013.

Page 5 of 5
  1. Miguel

    Miguel Well-Known Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2012
    Messages:
    2,604
    Likes Received:
    1
    If you proclaim yourself the best at 154 (as Floyd has done) then yes, if he doesn't fight Canelo or Trout, he's ducking - of course he is. He is the WBA 154 champion and claims he fights the best in each division...

    But yet because you guys don't like those 2 guys at 154 you're now justifynig it's not a duck because "he should stay at 147" where he can continue cherry-picking GBP 135/140 guys coming up...

    I said before the Guerrero fight "If Floyd takes Canelo on I'll hold my hands up and say that's a good challenge" - I also said he would not fight Canelo in September 100% - we know what happened there

    Floyd is predictable - not fighting Trout or Canelo is a duck, pure and simple. Not fighting Martinez is perhaps not quite a duck as it's no-win fight for Floyd
     
    Miguel, Apr 16, 2013
    #61
  2. turbotime

    turbotime Hall Of Famer Full Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2012
    Messages:
    42,762
    Likes Received:
    3,976
    Canelo will be rematching Trout if Trout wins.
     
    turbotime, Apr 16, 2013
    #62
  3. chesh

    chesh Active Member Full Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2006
    Messages:
    677
    Likes Received:
    0
    :deal:good
     
    chesh, Apr 16, 2013
    #63
  4. Royal-T-Bag

    Royal-T-Bag Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2008
    Messages:
    22,661
    Likes Received:
    4
    there are bigger name fights for him than Trout that will get preference, Trouts awesome but doesnt have a big following even though i'm a part of it
     
    Royal-T-Bag, Apr 16, 2013
    #64
Page 5 of 5