Haye had 85% of the Championship, and he beat 'the man' at Crusierweight, to become linear. Wlad has 50% of the Championship. You see the difference between champion and title holder yet?
It will happen. I just want to know if all these people being so disrespectful towards Haye; by totally refusing to accept that he has any chance whatsoever are going to give the man respect, should he actually beat Wlad.
Would you mind pointing out the difference again, please? Cuz here's what I read from you a couple posts above:
We all know Waldimir would have all four belts if he wasn't so avoided and ducked as he is. He would slaughter Valuev today, yesterday, any day with one arm tied behind his back. And he'd have the WBC belt too if Maskaev would have unified with Wladimir before Vitali felt the need to come back lend a helping hand. Haye rushed out of a unification fight with Steve Cunningham to meet the Kingpin, JC Chapman, Ray Mercer who what eventually became Monte Barrett. I would have liked to have seen Haye vs. Cunningham, that might have been interesting.
**** the belts as the ONLY rule. its based on PERCEPTION as well.... and perception is Wlad is the HW champ the #1 guy who holds 50% of the titles.
which is subjective and thus must be omitted. There is always someone who's gonna argue otherwise, no matter how dead right you are.
well get your boy to put pen to paper and we will find out.... thats what I ment Wlad signed 3 contract Haye 0 step up or shut up David:good
I don't disagree, I just see things a bit differently. The true "Heavyweight Champion" is a prestigious and historical title, and I don't think Wlad has done enough yet to earn it, although I understand plenty of people feel differently.