Wlad Klitschko would easily beat Mike Tyson

how is that touchy? I'm not the one who started making claims of intergalactic travels to teach my all encompasing knowledge about fictional fights...

 

I'm a little distracted because the Ali v Wepner fight is on right now and I'm loving it...

 

:rofl :yep

 

To answer the thread as it's written (as if I wasn't aware that the bonehead was just trolling):

No, Wlad would not easily beat Tyson, it would have to be a well thought out Manny plan executed to perfection, but that what Wlad does, the current version.

 

Holyfield and Douglas beat Tyson when he was young, Lewis battered a very poor version of Tyson, the one we saw against Williams, McBride, and Nielson.

 

Tyson vs Wlad in his prime would be murder....

TC you're insane....

 

Look Tyson was a great champion...I"m not looking to disbarage him in any way...but the plain truth is that it would be more than difficult for him to match the size speed and athleticism of Wlad

Mike gets his reputation because of the way he won fights not because of the caliber of fighters he beat

 

Douglas was a contender and was the Undisputed Champ which carries more weight than a Wbogus title, as far as Sanders goes he wasn't even ranked in the top 30 before he blew Wlad out, Douglas is clearly more accomplised than both men.

 

Funny you should say that because Tyson fought and beat much better caliber of opponents than Wlad.

 

I won't discredit anything Douglas did, but lets be honest Tyson had him down in the 7th and should have finished things...he ****ed up and got KO'd


I want to be clear you argument now becomes that you and Buster will travel light years from mike's nuts to beat up Sanders Brewster and Purrity??

look all kidding aside I doubt Buster beats any of those three...

 

ok now you've gone and lost all boxing credibility, history doesn't change because you want it to pal

I've heard this argument many times and I'm not interested in rehashing it but tyson won well but didn't beat world beaters

 

Well i'm not a "star struck teeny-boppin fruitcake" being as how i'm a man in my mid 20's and I box myself. With that being said I agree with a piece of what you said, Lewis would have beaten ANY version of Tyson. But Klitschko AIN'T no Lennox Lewis:nono Lennox was the champion at HW when the division was somewhat respected. Klitschko was handled by Sanders and Brewster, Tyson would have taken that man's manhood. Yes I said that. Klitschko is a good fighter with a good jab and good punching power against guys that can't get in on him.

Ibrogimov and the Brewster rematch was a perfect example. But if you mean to tell me Tyson from 1989 would have suffered the same thing they did, you my friend are OUT OF YOUR MIND. Sanders hurt Klitschko, Tyson would MURDERED HIM. Brewster was able able to get to him in the first fight, Tyson would have CAVED IN HIS RIB CAGE and Klitschko would have made GIRL NOISES. The fact of the matter is there's NOTHING in the HW division that even close to what Tyson was.

I REALLY hope your not really Looking at the Mcbride fight like it kind of gives you an idea what Klitschko could have done. Cause the fact of the matter is THAT WASN'T TYSON THAT MCBRIDE AND WILLIAMS BEAT. Was that really Muhammad Ali that Larry Holmes beat? NO. Was that really Sugar Ray Leonard that Hector Camacho beat? NO. So you can't look at those fights like they mean ANYTHING. Tyson would have re-named Klitschko Robin Givens and would have destroyed him in less than 6 rounds:good

 

Delete

 

You're the Nuthugger here, Douglas is clearly more accomplished than all 3 of those journeymen who KO'd Wlad, with Brewster being the only half decent one in the bunch.

 

Bull****.

Brewster defended that WBO belt multiple times against Meehan, Golota, Krasniqi & Liakhovich. Buster lost the very first defense in embarassing fashion to Holyfield. He was terrible, a true flash in the pan.

Sanders is on par with Douglas, in fact he had a bigger punch than Buster.