Wlad v Dempsey

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by lufcrazy, Feb 5, 2013.


  1. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    395
    Jan 22, 2010
    At least as much. My point is would the smaller heavyweights as Dempsey and my man Joe Louis, hit hard enough to topple the bigger heavyweights
    of today.? Most certainly...The left hook that Jack Dempsey had to REACH up to floor the 250 pound Jess Willard was an amazing feat. For Dempsey to throw a punch over his head and drop Willard who was never floored BEFORE was something...And the tremendous right hand that Joe Louis
    at 200 pounds knocked out the front teeth and mouthpiece of rugged
    Paolino Uzcudun [an earlier edition of George Chuvalo], was as hard a right hand ever landed...
     
  2. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,725
    Sep 14, 2005
    Willard was a crude, unskilled hillbilly farmer with a pitchfork. Furthermore...Willard was 37 years old, 20lb overweight, and coming off a 3 year layoff. Willard looked like he trained on bacon, hash, and wheel barreling goat **** all day. Willard knew more about milking cows than he did about boxing skills.
     
  3. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    395
    Jan 22, 2010
    My point was that "unskilled" that Willard may have been, he could take
    a punch , and was NEVER floored BEFORE, suffice to say. Jack Johnson
    hit Willard with every punch in his arsenal for TWENTY FIVE rounds under
    a 105% degree Havana sun, and couldn't hurt him at all. I know S it is hard to give for you, Dempsey his due, but try it, it wouldn't hurt...peace.
     
  4. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    60,687
    44,628
    Feb 11, 2005
    This is just great. Bravo.
     
  5. bobbob

    bobbob Member Full Member

    192
    20
    Nov 6, 2009
    We have the Alcoholics Anonymous, maybe we should start another group called the Nostalgia Anonymous for the people in the classic forum :D

    You are just trying too hard guys. I love this forum.
     
  6. Mango

    Mango New Member Full Member

    84
    1
    Jun 18, 2014
    Yes, this does seem to be the place where nostalgic "historians" assemble - to reassure each other that modern boxers suck and would be schooled by the greats of yesteryear. Some truly hilarious stuff can be found here!
     
  7. Harman

    Harman Member Full Member

    467
    1
    Mar 24, 2009
    In 2014 under K2 Rules with K2 Ref etc. Dempsey had no chance.

    Put Wlad in a Timemachine and send him back to Dempsey Aera with these brutal Rules at these time (backfist or hit when oppenent got his count) Wlad get knocked out in first three Rounds.
     
  8. dinovelvet

    dinovelvet Antifanboi Full Member

    60,722
    23,030
    Jul 21, 2012
    Exactly this. Strip Wlad of all holding and fouling and he has no chance.

    Without K2 rules Wlad is just an ordinary man.
     
  9. lufcrazy

    lufcrazy requiescat in pace Full Member

    80,269
    20,972
    Sep 15, 2009
    Modern boxers are great imo. Two of my top 3 are from the last twenty years. That's not to say Klitschko will beat Dempsey though.
     
  10. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    60,687
    44,628
    Feb 11, 2005
    I find it rather silly to bet on a guy who had about an 18 month prime and then sat on his ass and ducked his best opposition over a guy who has dominated the division for 8+ years. The burden of proof is much better fulfilled by one than the other.
     
  11. burt bienstock

    burt bienstock Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    18,285
    395
    Jan 22, 2010
    You sir are so obsessed in your hatred of Jack Dempsey that you obscure my point that Willard NEVER floored before ,was hit by a tremendous left hook by Dempsey thrown from a difficult angle upwards to reach Willard's
    chin. Instead of addressing my post, you have to ignore my valid point and
    call Willard a cow milker...For your edification Jess Willard whatever his faults took a punch better than any of your modern hero's. Please stick to the subject and try to eliminate your distaste for Jack Dempsey who I'm sure never harmed you personally...
     
  12. Bummy Davis

    Bummy Davis Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    23,660
    2,138
    Aug 26, 2004
    The precedent set by Sullivan, Johnson, Jeffries, on was not to fight everyone. I dont know why Dempsey did not fight Wills it would have been a good fight for him and even the smaller Greb but Willard did fight Dempsey and Jess was a strong guy. We will say Jess was inactive but the manner in which Dempsey destroyed him was impressive for the day, Jack had some good fights and even a rusty Dempsey impressed with his VICIOUS KO over Sharkey and the long count vs Tunney. Jack's inactivity hurt him and you could see the rust but his power & speed and meanness were there, It would take the best JD to get to Wlad and Wlad is now a 63-3 Heavyweight Champion that may have a couple of years left, possibly dangerous years but he is a specimen of condition and activity that should be commended

    I hear both sides but prime to prime a super fight with Dempsey dangerously alive and Wlad with a serious plan
     
  13. SuzieQ49

    SuzieQ49 The Manager Full Member

    37,077
    3,725
    Sep 14, 2005
    I don't care about his durability. Yes, Willard could take a punch. I am not impressed. What impresses me about a big man is if he possesses quality boxing skills. Skills are far more important than Durability. Willard did not possess any skills. He may have taken a better punch than some modern heavyweights, but he doesn't possess there boxing skill level.
     
  14. Seamus

    Seamus Proud Kulak Full Member

    60,687
    44,628
    Feb 11, 2005
    Those who can't see how boxing champions developed from touring amateur show contesters to true professional, ranked international athletes will always be woefully inadequate to judge these cross-generational bouts.

    Dempsey & Co. had one foot in the past, one in the future, between barnstormer carnival barkers and carefully contrived, ballyhooed match-ups against no-hopers. In this sense, they were truly revolutionary… and therein the real credit is due.
     
  15. Ted Spoon

    Ted Spoon Boxing Addict Full Member

    3,254
    1,048
    Sep 10, 2005
    Dempsey did not fight Wills no, and his legacy is bruised accordingly, but are we to forget that Wladimir let his brother take care of the man who crushed him?

    This is much worse. Playground politics in a boxing ring.