Really? I don´t know, I´m normally more in the Classic Section... but there you gets frustated more and more with the time...
hey irishdawg/jack presscot/dan almeida or what ever you like to call yourself nowadays, go **** a donkey.
It would be a difficult fight for both of them and Wlad has size with good skills to match. Wlad has lost to lesser opponents and Marciano would use his size to an advantage and push Wlad more than he can handle. Marciano stops him in the mid to late rounds.
Why? He never could get down to lightheavy, he was a shredded lean fghter at 184-196 (first walcott fight, second Charles fight)
Your right, it isn't. That is why Klitchko would not win. He has a midlleweights head on a 6'7" body. If not for weights he's be about 40 pounds lighter.
I like Wlad but your argument is completely stupid. atsch Do you remeber Wlad-Brester I, the size difference was tha same as Wlad-Brewster II. :tong The true difference was that there was not the same Wald and not the same Brewster in both fights. I think Marciano would be a much better vesion of Brewster from the first fight. Rocky was perfect body puncher and that was the reason Brewster won first fight. So I would still prefer Wlad to KO Rocky but I think there is great possibility Wald will be knocked out as well. Size difference have nothing to do with this.
No, Stinky. My argument wasn't stupid. I was simply putting the size difference into perspective, by using how much bigger Wlad was then a guy that is much bigger than Marciano. There is a such thing as a size advantage that is just too much to overcome, and it exists in this hypothetical and mythical matchup :deal
Really? Marciano would be like 9 inches shorter and 50lbs lighter. Picture Barrera vs Pavlik :good Only a bigger difference!!!!!!! :yikes
Nice start on a tread. Agree with me or be an idiot!!!! Do you only want a monolog or what. - By the way - Marciano would **** wlad in 1-2 rounds.