Wladimir Klitschko vs. David Haye

Quite honestly, i would pick Thompson over Haye. Thompson's chin, height, reach, and combination punching is far better than what I've seen from Haye. Plus Thompson is a southpaw and a pressure fighter...2 things that Haye would have trouble with.

 

You forgot to add "with a series of left hooks that even the current version of Gerald McClellan could have avoided" :deal

 

:rofl:rofl:rofl

 

Another valid observation from your goodself:-(

Speak to me on the 21st June.We'll then know how valid your observations are

I appreciate your aren't (too) biased however.jisi is stupidly biased to the point where it is quite ridiculous

 

Please try to avoid using "Wlad" and "Tyson" in the same sentence in future.

 

Hey, FW...isn't it frustrating being wrong all the time when predicting the eventual fall of the Klitschko Bros? Man, it must really hurt to be you!!

 

:nut

You may be a real boxing fan but your analysis of Haye is ****ing awful.

How can you possibly say Iggy is quicker than Haye? atsch

Right im on Hayes nuts because i believe it will be a much more competetive fight than you do and he will land at least 3 punches?

:good

 

Only one of these two can't fight backing up, and it ain't Haye.

 

You're right...Tyson couldn't fill Wlad's jock. At least according to your wife.

 

Ah yes, because we have seen him do this against.........:yep

He took umpteen rounds to pick a late replacement Rahman apart. :nut

 

Give the guy his props he has made valid observations.3 punches is being kind to Haye

 

Other than Wlad would be scraped off the canvas versus Tyson. :deal

 

It's the truth...watch Sultan's last three fights and you will see he is a much faster fighter with much better footwork.

 

Yeah...if tyson was able to use a stepladder!!

 

Yeh his feet probably did look quick against a 270lb Briggs,a 45 year old and a robotatsch