WLAD's rematch CLAUSE is a DISGRACE

Exactly, these are just the ramblings of Haye's nuthuggin' fans, we don't take them seriously.

 

There was no guarantee given that the two fights would be against either brother.

Booth's passed it on to Golden Boy to haggle with K2

 

That's you? No wonder, I was arguing with a gay child..................

 

Once again these sack swingers are just agreeing with everything Haye's team says because they hate everything about the Klitschkos.

 

opportunity? so much bull****. your trying to spin this any way you can with no objectivity. are you trying to tell me that hes got to undisputed cruiser champ and is now trying to box the heavyweight champ in 22 fights and hes a *****?

really?

im a boxing fan before any fighter. this is everything thats wrong with the sport. youve got three competitive fighters here who could do something great.

the sports needs fighters like haye.

wlad vs chris a anyone?

 

Ok but TO PUT IT IN THE CLAUSE THAT HE'D HAVE TO FIGHT VITALI IS FU34IN STUPID!! A CLAUSE TO FIGHT WLAD IN A REMATCH IS COOL..

SO IF RAFEAL MARQUEZ FOUGHT VASQUEZ AGAIN WOULD IT BE OK TO HAVE A REMATCH CLAUSE SAYIN THAT IF RAFAEL LOST THAN VASQUEZ HAVE TO FIGHT HIS BRO JUAN MANUEL MARQUEZ??

THATS SOME BIT34 **** IF U ASK ME:nono

 

Do you not understand that it was David Haye who wanted a shot at both brothers?atsch They were simply working out a way in the contract that if Haye beat Wlad twice, he would then get a shot at Vitali and WBC title as well. Which is EXACTLY what Haye would want next. They were simply getting it all done at once. Haye himself said a while back that he was negotiating possibly fighting both brothers. You guys are just running with this **** like it is some sort of bull**** ploy. Why the hell do you think David Haye had no problem with that part of the contract? BECAUSE IT IS WHAT DAVID HAYE WANTED!

Why on earth would Haye have NOT wanted those 3 big fights, 3 big paydays, shots at the WBC, IBF, WBO, IBO and Ring Magazine Championship titles? Think about it.

 

Do you have reading comprehension problems? When did I say anything about Haye being a *****? What I am saying is that half of the people on this forum have no ability to use logic. Two fights with Wlad and then a showdown with Vitali is EXACTLY what David Haye wants. Which is why he agreed to that part of the contract.

 

Regardless its stupid...AND TO WIN THE RING YOU NEED #1 VS #2...HE WOULDN'T WIN THE RING TITLE!:deal

 

Do you have a source for your claim that the contract specified one rematch against Wlad and one fight against Vitali and did not, as Haye's team say, just give K2 open options on Haye's next two fights?

Also, can you confirm what money splits Haye would be entitled to for those two fights, what other conditions there were and whether he would be able to fulfill any mandatories that he might have for the titles won?

Thanks.

 

for real everyone wants to see vklit and haye so guess what this makes it a whole of a hell lot easier so im totally ok with it

 

Indeed they are. Options were the reason why Vitali didn't unify the belts, now options are fine? :think

Pathetic double standards. :deal

 

If David Haye beat Wlad twice..... Haye and Vitali would DEFINITELY be #1 and #2.

 

It was Haye's own manager who said the deal was two fights against Wlad and then the fight against Vitali.atsch
He also said that he agreed to those terms. HAYE WANTED THEM!

 

He said that they would agree to that. He didn't say that was what K2 actually wanted to put in the contract though.