Cheers for the reply Im happy with Wilde there to tell you the truth, I have had a few people say he was a tad to high if anything. I wouldnt..I think Nard may be a tad high there but I wouldnt have him any lower then 60 anyway. Joe is in the right place, H2H he goes well but the wins are just not there over prime opposition. I can dig the comment regarding Pac but I like him :tong Jake has wins over the no1, 48, 90, 108 on my list and a host of other good fighters to boot..I do agree thats the very highest Id ever have him, maybe could stand to get pushed back a little but I dont have an issue with him there. RE: The P.S..I agree with that somewhat but there are also other factors you need to take into consideration such as where the respective fighters were in their career and the nature of the fight. I think basing each fighter on their own merit is the most important factor however..much more important.
IMO... This content is protected This content is protected This content is protected A great list mate, some things I agree with, some things I don't, but all round a fantastic effort. No real shocking crimes (I still think Ross is too low and Hagler too high, there shouldn't only be one space between those two guys, Hagler's resume against natural middleweights just doesn't justify it at all), and some very good calls. You have got the often overrated in good positions (Calzaghe, Jack Dempsey the heavyweight, Larry Holmes, George Foreman, Stanley Ketchel) and you have given some true greats their due (Griffith, Charles, Arguello, Whitaker, Pacquiao, McCallum). I think the modern trio of Hopkins, Holyfield and Lewis are all a bit low (especially Holyfield, a very strange ranking IMO), but that's a minor gripe. Well done :good (though I have to ask - why no number 68?) And why did none of these guys make the cut mate: - GEORGE CARPENTIER - HARRY WILLS - SONNY LISTON - PANAMA AL BROWN - JAMES TONEY Do you really think guys like Calzaghe and Tsyzu have the resumes to be in there ahead of these five?
I think Holyfield is far too low. It's really my only major problem. I can't see what Lopez, Fenech, Loi, Dempsey, Pryor, Cervantes, Elorde, Locche, and a lot of others did that earns them a spot above Evander. He's got a better resume than all of those I mentioned, was dominant at his stay at cruiser, and had an impressive heavyweight career. The only two men who beat him in what could be argued his prime IMO were Bowe and Moorer, and he has wins over both. I haven't made a list in a while, but I would probably place him somewhere around #50. A good list overall though.
Cheers for the replies fellas...I pretty much gave up in the end, I was moving people around, not being happy with it and then moving them again. I was getting to immersed in research, it was taking a lot of my time and It was starting to be a pain, so I stopped looking a just left it at that, chucking on a few guys at the end to make it an even 120. So Im was always going to miss out on a few names and I take your critique on board. Having Evander there is quite bizarre actually...I put in the "who is greater Holmes/Evander" thread I have Holmes a bit higher and I wasnt sure why and that answers it. I thought I had him at 60 but he got pushed back and bit whilst I was chopping and changing..possibly as far back as the late 70's. Im fairly certain he was the phantom 68 but how he got pushed back 30 spots is beyond me..Im a big Holy fan to tell you the truth. So this is the revised list with Sonny Liston slotting in...bit of an oversight of mine, he should have made it in there. Top 50. 1. Ray Robinson 2. Henry Armstrong 3. Sam Langford 4. Harry Greb 5. Ezzard Charles 6. Benny Leonard 7. Roberto Duran 8. Willie Pep 9. Muhammed Ali 10. Joe Gans 11. Archie Moore 12. Joe Louis 13. Sugar Ray Leonard 14. Mickey Walker 15. Pernell Whitaker 16. Jimmy Wilde 17. Sandy Saddler 18. Gene Tunney 19. Carlos Monzon 20. Barney Ross 21. Marvin Hagler 22. Tony Canzoneri 23. Ike Williams 24. Bob Fitzsimmons 25. Emile Griffith 26. Kid Gavilan 27. Eder Jofre 28. Alexis Arguello 29. Tommy Hearns 30. Julio Cesar Chavez 31. Charley Burley 32. Joe Walcott 33. Salvador Sanchez 34. Jose Napoles 35. Carlos Ortiz 36. Michael Spinks 37. Fighting Harada 38. Roy Jones Jr 39. Luis Manual Rodriguez 40. Jimmy McLarin 41. Tommy Loughran 42. Rocky Marciano 43. Harold Johnson 44. Manny Pacquaio 45. Wilfredo Gomez 46. Ruben Olivares 47. Jake Lamotta 48. Holman Williams 49. Ted Lewis 50. Bernard Hopkins 51. Jack Johnson 52. Dick Tiger 53. Abe Attell 54. Terry McGovern 55. Floyd Mayweather Jnr 56. Wilfred Benitez 57. Carlos Zarate 58. Bob Foster 59. Jack “Kid” Berg 60. Packey McFarland 61. Lou Ambers 62. Jim Driscoll 63. Stanley Ketchel 64. Dave Holly 65. Kid Chocolate 66. Miguel Canto 67. Azumah Nelson 68. Evander Holyfield 69. Mike McCallum 70. Manuel Ortiz 71. Oscar De La Hoya 72. Vicente Salvidar 73. Pascual Perez 74. Lennox Lewis 75. Billy Graham 76. Young Corbett 77. Felix Trinidad 78. Billy Conn 79. Aaron Pryor 80. Joe Frazier 81. Lloyd Marshall 82. Nicolino Lochee 83. Flash Elorade 84. Jack Britton 85. George Foreman 86. Larry Holmes 87. Tiger Flowers 88. Jeff Fenech 89. Antonio Cervantes 90. Marcel Cerdan 91. Ricardo Lopez 92. Carmen Basillo 93. Jack Dempsey 94. Duillo Loi 95. Joe Brown 96. Erik Morales 97. Gene Fullmer 98. Mike Tyson 99. Beau Jack 100. PanchoVilla 101. Nonpareil Jack Dempsey 102. Sammy Angott 103. Lew Tendler 104. Sonny Liston 105. Marco Antonio Barrera 106. Bob Montgomery 107. Ismael Laguna 108. Fritizie Zivic 109. Jack Dillon 110. Shane Mosley 111. Jersey Joe Walcott 112. Jim Jeffries 113. Young Griffo 114. Eusebio Pedroza 115. Jimmy Bivins 116. Kostya Tszyu 117. Owen Moran 118. Nino Benvenuti 119. Joe Calzaghe 120. Johnny Kilbane That was the only major change I made..Ill work on it from time to time, taking people out, putting people in, moving them around but overall Im pleased with it.
I'd move Kid Gavilan up a slot or two on the list. He holds 2 wins over Williams in their trilogy and victories over Carmen Basillio and Beau Jack all of whom hold victories over Williams.
jimmy bivins always losses on big time fights...harry wills sould be given BIG consideration since you put langford at #3..at the very worse, he should be in the top 50 willis has the number of sam langford
Harry not being there is another oversight I admit but Im not so sure Id have him top 50..Id have to think about it. His wins over Langford certainly mean he should be ranked in at least the 100 but considering the size advantage he had over Langford, you have to put those wins into context and not just take them on face value. His first win over Sam was when Langford was 31 in the long tailend of his career and Wills was 25 or so and just coming into his prime years. Wills was a true heavyweight, relatively big for the day whereas Sam was more suited to middleweight. Other then Langford, Harry's resume is a little thin compared to a lot of guys in the 100..No fault of his own more then likely as he seemed to be avoided like the plague, especially by Dempsey..A win over Dempsey would have changed how his career is viewed immensely. Im not sure what your are talking about saying Bivins lost all his big time fights considering he has wins over Charles, Burley, Moore, Marshall and Maxim. Most of his losses came in the last 1/3 of his career. RE: Kostya over Shane..Mosley was a name that was in that list towards the end but he got squeezed out. I think I would have had him at 122-123 if I continued anyway. Beating Marga wont catapault him up the list as far as some people would want him to but he will certainly move up some places. Im sure Id put him over Kostya now seeing as though he wasnt that far behind him IMO to start off with.
How long did it take you to put together a list like this mate ? I'm in the process of trying to do something like this myself but will be more likely to be a top 50 at most. The more I research it the harder it becomes, not to mention time consuming. Also what factors did you take into consideration to place these guys where you did. Was it a combination of titles held and opposition fought or were there other factors ?
Thats fair..they are close anyway. But considering Ike's best weight was lightweight and Gavilan's was welter, the wins have to be put into context, especially when Ike gave away 10 pounds in their last fight. Just because Gavilan has the edge H2H doesnt necessarily make him clearly the greater fighter when you think about it. I dont have a problem with someone putting Gav higher but I dont agree with their fight series being the breaker.
When I did the original 50 about 2 years ago I spent a couple of weeks working on it. Not every day or anything..Id go 3 or 4 days sometimes with out even looking at it, but then I could spend close to 3 hours working on it in a sitting. This time around I kept the 50 mostly in tact, with a few minor changes..I spent like a week doing the 100 then I gave up and just slotted in the rest in, extending it to 120 because there were a few names I wanted to put in to show (to myself mainly but others aswell) that I hadnt forgotten about these guys, they just missed out. I wanted to fully do it properly but in the end I was just spending to much time looking up stuff..rather be fishing, boating and/or drinking to tell you the truth. Hence why its far from perfect and now you can see people are pointing out its flaws, which I was expecting. Its good fun but it can drag you into far sometimes with the researching. First and foremost its about the resume. Who they beat, how they beat them, their longevity as a champ or/and a contender, their level of dominance. Their p4p achievments are very important but you have to look at the opposition beaten more then anything. Manny has won many titles across a lot of weight divisions if you were to base it purely on that then he would be very high on the list. But you have to consider the guys he beat to get them, where they were in their respective careers at the time and the fact that he fights in an era with a lot more divisions and titles to fight for. Takes a bit of time to research the names on a lot of guys records because they can often be obscure..And it certainly should involve more then just looking up boxrec and youtube. I put a lot less emphasis on H2H specualtion but I do consider it when making the list nonetheless. I got to be honest I wasnt totally consistent with my criteria. Some guys are in there because I like them and I put more emphasis on other criteria to cater for them a little more. But you have to because some guys you can see there whole career on film, whereas other you would be hardpressed to see any video on them. For instance a guy like Pryor doesnt have near the resume of many guys behind him but his clearly a monster H2H at the weight he fought at. A guy like Greb is there based purely on his amazing record, not because he impressed on film because there is basically none of him. Good luck with it mate. They are fun to make and you can learn a lot in the process.:good
Thanks mate, its been very educational so far thats for sure. I have been using quite a few sources in regards to researching some of these guys. One book I have thats been very handy so far is the ibhof boxing register, definitely recommended. I have a feeling this is something that will take a fair while to do but it keeps me out of trouble when I'm bored so its all good.