I understand your point. I guess what I was trying to say is that in my opinion Bradley could have legitimately been given 5 rounds (but not six or seven) so if it was a robbery, it wasn't even close to being one of the worst ones. But I've argued with other fights that if a fighter clearly wins seven rounds and doesn't get win than it is a robbery. So, Bradley-Pac was a robbery.
Yeah i understand your point, though i really couldn't even give him 5 rounds to be honest, there was times Manny seemed to coast towards the end & really at times felt like he was feeling sorry for how he was out doing Bradley, The Horn fight i could never fathom the official result even with the Ref who continued to let Horn Cut Pacquaio & be dirty throughout the fight, with all that said i still didn't see anything effective from Horn in those moments unless your scoring the wrestling,holding,elbowing headbutting as points it really was easy to score the clean punches even while watching it live, I was astonished at the results though it wasn't totally out of the realm as people's bias towards Pacquiao had only worsened up to that point & i still feel he is the one of the most robbed top level fighters that the game has ever had.
The Bradley decision equaled some of Canelos "wins" Blatant Robbery The Ref won that fight for Horn. Gave him carte blanche to do what he liked without penalty He did just that Should have been a DQ win for Pac
Marquez finally found his nut, The fact that his victory seems to be celebrated each & every time just goes to show great Pacquiao is, i turn around & there's another new video or "shorts" posted, Hell even the two times Marquez stood up in his HOF induction's He still found a way to make it all about Pacquiao which was embarrassing & the fact that it's almost been a full decade since it happened speaks volume, Just the stature of being associated with the legendary Pacman, enjoy.
Their names will forever be linked in the Boxing hall of fame echo chamber for eternity ... "N' yoy!" This content is protected
I'm glad i'm not the only one who thought this, i didn't see anything wrong with Horn getting a decision over Pacquiao either. I've only seen the fight once and maybe i need to review it again, but as i remember it Horn roughed up Pacquiao kind of Agapito Sanchez did all those years ago, and i thought Horn did enough based on his aggression. I also thought Bradley/Pacquiao 1 was a bit closer than people made out, i'm not saying i didn't think Pacquiao won which i did. But i didn't think it was quite the landslide that everyone portrayed it as.
horn won that fight fair and square, and i was cheering for manny. horn simply did more imo. wasn't even close to a robbery. vs bradley was terrible. pacman won clearly.