You reap what you sew, Paclanders

He only beat him once.

 

I'm def a Pac-fan. I love whats he's done for boxing and for himself. I for one don't want him to fight Mosley, for many reasons.

#1 i don't feel mosley deserves the fight. He had a draw and a loss for his last two fights. A fight like this is just like any fight with Hatton in it, these matchups are based off PPV numbers and gate draws, not the best talent vs the best talent

#2 I (like everyone else) want to see May-Pac, and I don't think this helps

#3 Pac gets no credit for this win, doesn't help his legacy. If this was Mosley from a few years ago, yes, but this Mosley, no-way

Just a couple of my thoughts on it.

 

24 rounds 4 knock downs a draw and a win.

That's in the books.

The difference is that Pac fought him on level terms.

 

Shut your ho ass up before slap the taste out your mouth....virtually that is. In all seriousness.....I don't ***** fool...I'm spittin' real talk.

PAC should fight JMM...I agree with that but it's more to do with giving JMM a paycheck before he retires than anything that will enhance PAC's legacy...the money would be nice to b/c JMM brings buying customers to the table...but PAC don't need JMM for building a stronger resume.

Seriously kid....JMM at 140 or above is nothing to be worried about when your PAC. Even at 135 or 130 JMM at this stage ain't cut from the same cloth he was 4 yrs back. Don't fool yourself.

 

I know....but we all know that JMM recv'd a draw on a technicality.

 

Man you are typically a decent poster, but you are on a shitty streak right now, between this **** and the Pascal debacle...you need to take some time away and get your head right, this is ****ing horrid. Pitiful, pitiful attempt....like two thumbs down.

 

Just like Pac received a draw in the same fight due to inconsistant reffing???

 

:roll: That's reaching Uli..... Fact is PAC should have gotten the nod had not been for a mathematical error by one judge who scored the 1st round incorrectly. The ref had nothing to do with the scoring of the first round which is the only reason JMM got to hold on to his title.

 

Technical mastery by Marquez indeed!:deal


[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISUWyt4gIuU&feature=player_embedded[/ame]:yep

 

You mean PACthetic

 

:blood

 

Try the mathematical errors (plural) that the idiot judges who filled out his scorecard beforehand and how had Pacquiao winning 7 of the rounds.atsch

How convenient you keep bringing up an error (one) by the one judge, and fail to point out the many errors of the judge that had Pacquiao winning that fight.:nut

 

:blah:

 

Pac should have gotten the nod, just like DLH got the nod vs Sturm, Pea got the draw vs Chavez etc etc....

I had it 9-3 for JMM.

Also, hitting a fighter while his down, especially the way Pac did it to JMM warrants a point deduction, worst case scenario, if the fighter can't continue a DQ.

Rules are rules buddy.

 

7 ****ing rounds!!!!!

If that's not criminal, then what the **** is!!! :shock: