Your British P4P top 10 right now today ..............

No way can you ranked DeGale at 5. thats just stupid.

Rhodes is now a free agent, left Hatton Promotons apparently. Purse bids for him vs Konecny are next monday.

 

1. Froch
2. Khan
3. Cleverly
4. Munroe
5. Murray
6. Burns
7. Rhodes
8. DeGale
9. Gavin
10. Booth

-------------------------------------------

The likes of McDonnell, Simpson, Quigg, Brook, Chisora, Barker and Macklin could be considered for the lower spots.

 

:rofl

No Harrison ???

 

**** that clown.

No Gavin Rees.

Oh, and Dan,
























































Bodywarmers are gay :tong

 

1. Khan
2. Froch
3. Haye
4. De Gale
5. Brook
6. Burns
7. Munroe
8. Cleverly
9. Rhodes
10. Murray

 

What?

Nah...... you actually have to fight to be considered. This applies to another conspicuous absentee from the list too, though he is closing in on the award of "#1 Most Irritating SSN Presenter" after his prolonged stint of "guest" appearances.

As for Fraudley, my mother could chin him, despite giving away 15 inches in height and probably double that in reach

 

another DeGale at 10...come on guys this is ****ing crazy. someone explain to me why he would be in your top 10. Hes beat one domestic level fighter.

 

Froch is P4P the best with the best back to back CV out there...:deal

The rest can slug it out amongst themselves...:bbb

 

Donaire only really had Darchinnyan on his CV before getting into The Rings top 10, but his ability was there to see and it's been proved right now, after Montiel.

I'd have De Gale in mine, he didnt just 'beat' a domestic level fighter, he completely outclassed one, showing he's above that level. He's got some mad skills and has more heart than some people think he has.

I think he's gonna beat Groves now too, I backed Groves up until before their last two fights each, but I think De Gale has progressed further.

1. Froch
2. Haye
3. Khan
4. Cleverly
5. Rhodes
6. Brook
7. Burns
8. De Gale
9. Munroe
10. Gavin

 

Khan
Haye
Froch
Burns
Cleverly
Brook
Munroe
McCloskey
Macklin
DeGale

 

and what about Gavin...he jsut beat an area level fighter???

Munroe has beat 4-5 european level fighters, Macklin, McCloskey, Mageee, McDonnell all the same yet you rate a win over Paul Smith as bettee than that????

 

Do you rate your P4P on resume or talent, a mix of the two or just on who you like most? If he thinks DeGale is more talented than Munroe then I see no reason to think it's an outrageous decision to pick someone who completely out classed a domestic level guy and won Olympic gold, a far superior achievement than beating the names you mention imo and even though it doesn't count in the professional ranks (for obvious reasons) it speaks highly of his skill.

I'm not sure what my list would be because I would no doubt forget someone. However I'm almost sure I'd put DeGale in the top 10. **** it, I'll have a go:

1. Khan
2. Haye
3. Froch
4. Burns
5. Cleverly
6. Murray
7. Rhodes
8. Gavin
9. DeGale
10. Munroe

 

who the hell has khan over froch, lol


1.froch
2.haye
3.khan
4.cleverly
5.de gale
6.brook
7.murray
8.burns
9.murray
10.munroe

amazing to think 11-20 (rhodes, macklin, hatton, mccloskey, gavin, fury, booth) etc could very easily jump into 5 and below with a few decent wins

top 4 pretty much writes itself

 

you can't do any kind of ranking based on talent or potential. Has to be on actual performance and who a guy has faced.

DeGale is not even top 15 its mental to have him top 10.....top 5 is literally ****ing stupid.