Alexis Arguello: Where P4P?

Discussion in 'Classic Boxing Forum' started by Mark Anthony, Oct 29, 2024.

?

Was Arguello overrated?

  1. Alexis. A was overrated

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  2. Arguello was an all-time great

    67 vote(s)
    100.0%
  3. Alexis was a weight bully

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
Multiple votes are allowed.
  1. Mark Anthony

    Mark Anthony Internet virgin Full Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2023
    Messages:
    7,532
    Likes Received:
    3,500
  2. Greg Price99

    Greg Price99 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2018
    Messages:
    4,996
    Likes Received:
    9,613
    slash, Clinton, Bronze Tiger and 4 others like this.
  3. Flash24

    Flash24 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2015
    Messages:
    6,453
    Likes Received:
    9,451
    Alexis Arguello was one of the greatest fighters in the history
    of the sport.
    Arguello should be in anyone's top fifty boxers of all time.
     
    Smoochie, TipNom, DJN16 and 5 others like this.
  4. Lankykong

    Lankykong Member Full Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 2023
    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    284
    How does being tall for the weight equate to being a weight bully?
     
  5. ChrisJS

    ChrisJS Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2018
    Messages:
    3,236
    Likes Received:
    7,118
    All-time great. Absolutely 100% in the top 50.
     
    DJN16, slash, Clinton and 3 others like this.
  6. Mark Anthony

    Mark Anthony Internet virgin Full Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2023
    Messages:
    7,532
    Likes Received:
    3,500
    Reach advantage is a huge thing, he never tested himself against fighters the same size as him.
     
  7. Ney

    Ney Boxing Junkie Full Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2024
    Messages:
    8,202
    Likes Received:
    10,667
    I’ll be very curious to read the case of anyone who says he isn’t one of the greats.
     
  8. Vic-JofreBRASIL

    Vic-JofreBRASIL Obsessed with Boxing Full Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2010
    Messages:
    22,510
    Likes Received:
    4,925
    ATG. Skillwise I rank him high. I probably rank him among the top 25 p4p.
     
    slash, 88Chris05 and Minotauro like this.
  9. Flash24

    Flash24 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2015
    Messages:
    6,453
    Likes Received:
    9,451
    So because of his height and reach advantages in your opinion
    Arguello wasn't great?
    How about
    Thomas Hearns?
    Sandy Saddler?
    Esubio Pedroza?
    Michael Spinks?
    Ray Robinson?
    All of them usually had great height
    and reach
    advantages.
     
    TipNom, DJN16, Rexrapper 1 and 7 others like this.
  10. robert ungurean

    robert ungurean Богдан Philadelphia Full Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2007
    Messages:
    16,180
    Likes Received:
    15,179
    Legit ATG
    Probably my favorite fighter of all time
     
    Smoochie, surfinghb, TipNom and 6 others like this.
  11. Mark Anthony

    Mark Anthony Internet virgin Full Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2023
    Messages:
    7,532
    Likes Received:
    3,500
    Robinson only had a 72.5 inch reach, Ray Leonard had a 74 inch reach as does Bud Crawford but without their heights, yes Hearns was a massive weight bully, his fight v Duran looked absurd.
     
  12. Mark Anthony

    Mark Anthony Internet virgin Full Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2023
    Messages:
    7,532
    Likes Received:
    3,500
    Hearns had an even longer reach than Spinks.
     
    Smoochie and Flash24 like this.
  13. greynotsoold

    greynotsoold Boxing Addict

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2011
    Messages:
    5,470
    Likes Received:
    6,956
    I know what spurred this thread. I just saw the new Fouts Boxing youtube video in which he says that Arguello was an overrated bum. In the comments, Fouts asserts that he would beat Arguello because Alexis had no skills.
     
    Rexrapper 1 and Dorrian_Grey like this.
  14. Greg Price99

    Greg Price99 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Dec 17, 2018
    Messages:
    4,996
    Likes Received:
    9,613
    Hearns also had a longer reach than Tua.

    Hearns was vastly better than Tua, relatative to their respective sizes.

    Yet Tua would have destroyed Hearns.

    Arguello and Hearns respective reaches were an advantage, just as their slight builds were a disadvantage, that typically broadly offset each other relative to their opponents, meaning the more skilled and/or effective fighter usually won.

    There is a reason boxing is divided into weight, rather than reach, divisions.
     
    Bokaj, Clinton, Jel and 8 others like this.
  15. Flash24

    Flash24 Boxing Addict Full Member

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2015
    Messages:
    6,453
    Likes Received:
    9,451
    I think you're equating weight with height. Especially back in the days of same day weigh-ins.
    You're equating weight with height and reach. Especially back in the day of same day weigh-ins.
    Yes Thomas Hearns had a height and reach advantage over Leonard.
    But Leonard weighted more than Hearns for example.
    So who was the weight bully?
    And what was the significance of it when Leonard only weighed a pound more?
    Arguello fought in an era of same day weigh-ins.
    He wasn't a weight bully.
    Most of the " weight bully " occurrences have been in the last 20- 30 yrs of boxing.
     
    Smoochie, TipNom, Bokaj and 6 others like this.